2010
DOI: 10.1121/1.3290995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of tectorial membrane and basilar membrane longitudinal coupling in cochlear mechanics

Abstract: Most mathematical models of the mammalian cochlea neglect structural longitudinal coupling. However, recent experimental data suggest that viscoelastic longitudinal coupling, in the basilar membrane (BM) and the tectorial membrane (TM), is non-negligible. In this paper, mathematical models for BM and TM longitudinal coupling are presented to determine the influence of such a coupling on the tuning of the BM. The longitudinal coupling models are added to a macroscopic linear model of the guinea pig cochlea that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
130
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(61 reference statements)
10
130
0
Order By: Relevance
“…by reducing the longitudinal spread of excitation [8], allowing adjacent regions of the cochlea to vibrate at their own local best frequencies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…by reducing the longitudinal spread of excitation [8], allowing adjacent regions of the cochlea to vibrate at their own local best frequencies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, more recent experiments that show longitudinally propagating traveling waves along the TM challenge this notion [4]. The presence of a second cochlear traveling wave has important implications for auditory mechanisms [4,6,8,9], particularly in light of a new mouse model with genetically altered hearing (Tectb −/− ) [10]. Tectb −/− mice have reduced sensitivity, but strikingly sharper frequency selectivity that is difficult to explain with conventional theories of cochlear amplification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The past decade has brought remarkable advances in the understanding of the micromechanics of the auditory system and its components (Barral and Martin 2011;Brownell et al 2011;Cheatham and Dallos 2000;Dong and Olson 2009;Eiber 2008;Elliott et al 2007Elliott et al , 2011Eze and Olson 2011;Fettiplace 2006;Fisher et al 2012;Gao et al 2013;Gavara and Chadwick 2009;Gavara et al 2011;Gu et al 2008;He et al 2008;Hemila et al 2010;Hong and Freeman 2006;Jacob et al 2009;Kapadia and Lutman 2000;Kitani et al 2011;Kolston 2000;Grosh 2011, Meaud andGrosh 2010;Naidu and Mountain 2007;Nam and Fettiplace 2012;Ren and Nuttall 2000;Rhode 2007;Santos-Sacchi 2008;Van Dijk et al 2011;Zhang et al 2007;Zheng et al 2007). Quantitative descriptions of basilar membrane motion patterns are available for the base and the apex of the mammalian cochlea (e.g., Olson et al 2012;Robles and Ruggero 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…¼ 2% f ) and m 1 is the BM mass per unit area. This equation ignores the longitudinal coupling motion reported by Meaud and Grosh [26] because the model does not include the longitudinal coupling of the BM. Figure 7 shows the isolevel contours of the cubic distortion 2 f 1 À f 2 .…”
Section: Distortion Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%