2006
DOI: 10.2143/itl.152.0.2017863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Task Complexity and Task Conditions on Foreign Language Development and Performance. Three Empirical Studies.

Abstract: The effect of task complexity and task conditions on foreign language development and performance: three empirical studies Sercu, L.; de Wachter, L.; Peters, E.; Kuiken, F.; Vedder, S.C.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the announcement of a postreading vocabulary test did not affect word retention. This finding was corroborated by Sercu and Dewachter (Sercu, Dewachter, Peters, Kuiken, & Vedder, 2006). Thus, in the aforementioned studies, the presence or absence of a postreading vocabulary test announcement created situations for, respectively, intentional and incidental learning.…”
Section: Previous Empirical Researchsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…However, the announcement of a postreading vocabulary test did not affect word retention. This finding was corroborated by Sercu and Dewachter (Sercu, Dewachter, Peters, Kuiken, & Vedder, 2006). Thus, in the aforementioned studies, the presence or absence of a postreading vocabulary test announcement created situations for, respectively, intentional and incidental learning.…”
Section: Previous Empirical Researchsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…They appeared to focus on meaning rather than the target linguistic items. This finding is in line with Sercu, De Wachter, and Kuiken’s (2006) study that it is not always effective to remind the students of the target linguistic item. In addition, it is possible that with the interpretation of the tasks as an activity of sharing personal experiences instead of practicing the linguistic feature, the learners eventually focused on meaning.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…There are some studies which have investigated the effect of manipulating task complexity along different resource-directing dimensions on different aspects of writing performance (Choong, 2014;Frear, 2014;Frear & Bitchener, 2015;Ishikawa, 2006;Kuiken & Vedder, 2007;Masrom et al, 2015;Rahimpour &Hosseini, 2010, andSercu et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baralt, 2010;Choong, 2011;Kim, 2009;Lee, 2002;Nuevo, 2006;Révész, 2011;Robinson, 2000, as cited in Robinson, 2005. However, of the small group of studies on cognitive task complexity and writing, the work of Choong (2014), Frear (2014, Kuiken, Mos, and Vedder (2005), Kuiken and Vedder (2007, 2008, 2012, Masrom, Alwi, and Daud (2015), and Sercu, De Wachter, Peters, Kuiken, and Vedder (2006) manipulated task complexity along reasoning demands dimension; in fact, some of these studies manipulated task complexity along both reasoning demands and number of elements.…”
Section: Reasoning Demands As a Variable Of Task Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%