1995
DOI: 10.1093/chemse/20.4.441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Sweeteners on Perceived Viscosity

Abstract: Two different sweeteners, sucrose and aspartame, were matched in perceived sweetness intensity. These solutions were thickened with carboxymethylcellulose to six different viscosity levels. Sucrose and aspartame appeared to decrease perceived viscosity of the solutions at a specific sweetener concentration, at all viscosity levels. However, in a second similar experiment with three viscosity levels and seven sucrose concentrations no effect of sucrose concentration on perceived viscosity was found. Reasons for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The perceived thickness of CMC in the mouth shows a significant (r 2 ϭ 0.93; P ϭ 0.002) logarithmic relationship with viscosity, with the viscosity measured with the same Brookfield viscometer type and shear rate (Theunissen and Kroeze 1995;see also Christensen 1979). Some of the neurons we recorded in the OFC (see Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The perceived thickness of CMC in the mouth shows a significant (r 2 ϭ 0.93; P ϭ 0.002) logarithmic relationship with viscosity, with the viscosity measured with the same Brookfield viscometer type and shear rate (Theunissen and Kroeze 1995;see also Christensen 1979). Some of the neurons we recorded in the OFC (see Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…(The pH for the 10 cP was 6.8, for the 100 and 1,000 cP was 7.0, and for the 10,000 cP was 7.4.) Based on psychophysical data from Theunissen and Kroeze (1995), a log-linear relationship exists between the rated oral thickness of CMC and its apparent viscosity. (The term apparent viscosity is used to indicate that the CMC solutions do not behave rheologically as Newtonian fluids: they show shear-thinning behavior.)…”
Section: Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This has also been reported by Brossard et al (2006) and may be one reason it is difficult to determine the origin of the impact of texture on taste perception in semi-solid dairy desserts. Conversely, sucrose concentration did not have any effect on thickness perception nor on rheological parameters, despite the fact that both such effects were reported in model viscous solutions (Christensen, 1980b;Pangborn et al, 1973;Theunissen and Kroeze, 1995), in vermouths (Burns and Noble, 1985) or in custard desserts (Lethuaut et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…First, the subjective ratings for stimulus thickness given by the subjects revealed a significant correlation between these ratings and the logarithm of the viscosity (Mela et al, 1994;Theunissen and Kroeze, 1995): Pearson's r ϭ 0.67; p Ͻ 0.001. Second, significant correlations were found between the fat content subjective ratings and the logarithm of the viscosity (r ϭ 0.51; p Ͻ 0.001) and, importantly, between fat content subjective ratings and thickness subjective ratings (r ϭ 0.75; p Ͻ 0.0001).…”
Section: Behavioral Datamentioning
confidence: 99%