The effect of SUV discretization in quantitative FDG-PET Radiomics: the need for standardized methodology in tumor texture analysis

Abstract

FDG-PET-derived textural features describing intra-tumor heterogeneity are increasingly investigated as imaging biomarkers. As part of the process of quantifying heterogeneity, image intensities (SUVs) are typically resampled into a reduced number of discrete bins. We focused on the implications of the manner in which this discretization is implemented. Two methods were evaluated: (1) RD, dividing the SUV range into D equally spaced bins, where the intensity resolution (i.e. bin size) varies per image; and (2) RB, maintaining a constant intensity resolution B. Clinical feasibility was assessed on 35 lung cancer patients, imaged before and in the second week of radiotherapy. Forty-four textural features were determined for different D and B for both imaging time points. Feature values depended on the intensity resolution and out of both assessed methods, RB was shown to allow for a meaningful inter- and intra-patient comparison of feature values. Overall, patients ranked differently according to feature values–which was used as a surrogate for textural feature interpretation–between both discretization methods. Our study shows that the manner of SUV discretization has a crucial effect on the resulting textural features and the interpretation thereof, emphasizing the importance of standardized methodology in tumor texture analysis.

Reproducibility of F18‐FDG PET radiomic features for different cervical tumor segmentation methods, gray‐level discretization, and reconstruction algorithms

“…We investigated the reproducibility of several subtypes of GLCM entropy feature as they were reported as one the highest reproducible and predictive radiomic features 21, 27, 30. We included: Entropy, Summation Entropy, Difference Entropy in addition to first‐order Entropy (Intensity Histogram Entropy) .…”

“…However, relying solely on semiquantitative measurements, SUV or MTV, as biomarkers have been shown to run into several pitfalls. For example, in addition to radiotracer dose sensitivity, SUV measurements are highly influenced by the distribution of radiotracer uptake, delayed time of injection, and imaging acquisition and reconstruction parameters 21. These factors can potentially reflect in substantial treatment assessment uncertainty.…”

Responsible Radiomics Research for Faster Clinical Translation

“…The complexity of the radiomics workflow increases the need to standardize computation methods (16)(17)(18)(19). Since September 2016, about 55 researchers from 19 institutions in 8 countries have participated in the Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative (IBSI), which aims at standardizing both the computation of features and the image-processing steps required before feature extraction (e.g., image interpolation and discretization).…”

Associations Between Somatic Mutations and Metabolic Imaging Phenotypes in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

“…All radiomic features were implemented in MATLAB (The MathWorks Inc.) and computed within the MTV. Before computation of the radiomic features, the image voxel intensities were resampled into equally spaced bin widths of 0.1 (31).…”