1993
DOI: 10.1159/000266266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Sustained Phonation at High and Low Pitch on Vocal Jitter and Shimmer

Abstract: Looking for possible signs of vocal fatigue, acoustic waveform perturbation was measured in normal female subjects during sustained phonation at various fundamental frequencies (Fo). At none of the pitch levels a rise of the jitter or the shimmer was found after25 min of vocalization. On the other hand, an effect of Fo was seen from the start: above the habitual speaking Fo of our subjects’ voices there was a tendency for the jitter to be higher and for the shimmer to be lower.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Most teachers were from primary' school (schoolchildren aged 7-12). One was a music teacher in secondary school (schoolchildren aged [13][14][15]. and 2 subjects were teachers of English.…”
Section: E Th O Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most teachers were from primary' school (schoolchildren aged 7-12). One was a music teacher in secondary school (schoolchildren aged [13][14][15]. and 2 subjects were teachers of English.…”
Section: E Th O Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14], or jit ter has altered in different ways in different subjects [3]. In shimmer, a trend toward lower values has been found after loading [4], or no clear changes have been detectable [14]. Sev eral reasons can be found to explain the dis crepancy of results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these studies, VF was elicited with several types of vocal loading tasks [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. Results are conflicting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some have reported no changes and others an increase in F0. [39][40][41][42] In this study, if it was assumed that most subjects had a form of vocal fatigue while fasting, based on the aforementioned heterogeneity of this symptom and the increase in the phonatory effort observed in more that two thirds while fasting, the authors can fairly say that vocal fatigue secondary to fasting did not result in an increase in the average fundamental frequency. There were mild variations in the perturbation parameters; however, the increase in the relative average perturbation and the decrease in the shimmer were not statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%