2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-012-0890-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of surface treatments on the field emission characteristics of patterned carbon nanotubes on KOVAR substrate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The E cutoff values of the Kovar alloy substrate and the DIR- and DLR-layers fabricated on the substrate were 15.28, 15.29, and 15.05 eV, respectively, determined by linearly extrapolating the high binding energy region of the UPS spectra. In accordance with the E cutoff values, the work functions of the Kovar alloy substrate and the DIR- and DLR-adhesion layers were calculated as 5.92, 5.91, and 6.15 eV, respectively, which were closely consistent with the reported literature values. , The work function of the DIR-adhesion layer was reduced by 0.24 eV compared to that of the DLR-adhesion layer, which can be explained by the shifted Fermi level toward the conduction band in the DIR-adhesion layer as shown in Figure a.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The E cutoff values of the Kovar alloy substrate and the DIR- and DLR-layers fabricated on the substrate were 15.28, 15.29, and 15.05 eV, respectively, determined by linearly extrapolating the high binding energy region of the UPS spectra. In accordance with the E cutoff values, the work functions of the Kovar alloy substrate and the DIR- and DLR-adhesion layers were calculated as 5.92, 5.91, and 6.15 eV, respectively, which were closely consistent with the reported literature values. , The work function of the DIR-adhesion layer was reduced by 0.24 eV compared to that of the DLR-adhesion layer, which can be explained by the shifted Fermi level toward the conduction band in the DIR-adhesion layer as shown in Figure a.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In accordance with the E cutoff values, the work functions of the Kovar alloy substrate and the DIRand DLR-adhesion layers were calculated as 5.92, 5.91, and 6.15 eV, respectively, which were closely consistent with the reported literature values. 26,38 The work function of the DIRadhesion layer was reduced by 0.24 eV compared to that of the DLR-adhesion layer, which can be explained by the shifted Fermi level toward the conduction band in the DIR-adhesion layer as shown in Figure 5a.…”
Section: Band Structure Analysis Of the And Dlr-cnt Paste Emittersmentioning
confidence: 97%