1965
DOI: 10.1016/0020-7357(65)90006-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of surface topography upon the static stiffness of machine tools joints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many factors too complex to include in the design process have been noted to affect the stiffness of the members. Both Ito (1979) and Thornley (1965) have noted the effect of surface finish upon the pressure distribution at the interface between the members, although Thornley notes that the effect can be mitigated if the preload of the joints is sufficient to cause plastic deformation of surface asperities. Finally, several of the effects of joint assembly depend upon factors which vary randomly from one joint to another and for which no general analysis techniques exist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many factors too complex to include in the design process have been noted to affect the stiffness of the members. Both Ito (1979) and Thornley (1965) have noted the effect of surface finish upon the pressure distribution at the interface between the members, although Thornley notes that the effect can be mitigated if the preload of the joints is sufficient to cause plastic deformation of surface asperities. Finally, several of the effects of joint assembly depend upon factors which vary randomly from one joint to another and for which no general analysis techniques exist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nonlinearity is due to the increase in the real contact area resulting from the elastic deformation of the interface. Thornley et al also reported a similar relationship in their article [12]. Because the relationship is approximately linear for values of W v , K nu and K nl were obtained by the least-squares fitting method.…”
Section: Measurement Device and Experimental Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The contact stiffness has also been measured in directions normal and tangential to the interface to verify proposed models [9][10][11]. Furthermore, the influence of surface topography on contact stiffness has been investigated [12]. While these experimental studies examined contact stiffness between the same type of materials (mostly steel), machine tool supports usually involve contact between different types of materials such as cast iron, steel, and concrete.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A joint between two machine elements is defined as the region through which: the forces are transmitted from one member to the other. It follows that the Static and dynamic behaviour of a joint is exclusively dependent on the characteristics of the joint interface, which in turn will substantially influence the overall static and dynamic behaviour of the machine structures The true significance of joints was shown by researchers around 1965 when a. number of papers were published (1,2,3,4). Taylor (1) reported that he was : forced to make rough assumptions about the data on joints in order to improve the efficiency of th computer model of a planing machine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%