2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.02.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Surface Electric Stimulation of the Gluteal Muscles on the Interface Pressure in Seated People With Spinal Cord Injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
32
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These seating systems were demonstrated to positively influence interface pressure and skin oxygenation [15][16]. Other methods, such as electric gluteal muscle stimulation also showed effectiveness in decreasing the interface pressure, which might restore blood flow [17]. However, it is not clear what the optimal frequency of these seating interventions must be to increase the viability of the tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These seating systems were demonstrated to positively influence interface pressure and skin oxygenation [15][16]. Other methods, such as electric gluteal muscle stimulation also showed effectiveness in decreasing the interface pressure, which might restore blood flow [17]. However, it is not clear what the optimal frequency of these seating interventions must be to increase the viability of the tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Van Londen and associates completed a similar study on humans and found that the seat-buttocks interface pressure decreased whether the gluteal muscles were electrically stimulated simultaneously or alternately. 19 Functional electrical stimulation (FES) cycling has been proposed as an activity that may decrease the risk of PUs through the promotion of increased blood flow and thickening of the gluteus maximus. 20 Petrofsky et al compared the incidence of PUs in persons who performed FES cycling over a 2-year period with a non-FES cycling control group and found that the FES cycling group developed 90% fewer PUs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2007-2008 Janssen et al reported on the benefits of GM activation through surface stimulation in 13 SCI males [30,72]. Alternating side-toside stimulation was compared with simultaneous bilateral stimulation.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%