2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of suppressing and not accepting emotions on depressive symptoms: Is suppression different for men and women?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
66
2
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
10
66
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the anticipated emotion finally led to different levels of financial risk taking. In another study investigating the relationship between emotion regulation and depression, suppression was only related to depression in male samples, although women experienced more symptoms of depression (Flynn, Hollenstein, & Mackey, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…However, the anticipated emotion finally led to different levels of financial risk taking. In another study investigating the relationship between emotion regulation and depression, suppression was only related to depression in male samples, although women experienced more symptoms of depression (Flynn, Hollenstein, & Mackey, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Results indicated that males reported more habitual use of suppression than females, representing a common trend of suppression (Flynn, Hollenstein, & Mackey, 2010;Gross & John, 2003). Inconsistent with existing literature regarding school connectedness (Anderman, 2002;Hagborg, 1994), males perceived lower levels of school connectedness.…”
Section: Descriptive Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, it was detected that the significant SeB chi-square difference disappeared only when the path coefficient from suppression to depression was released (Model 3), DSeB scaled c 2 ¼ 6.73, df ¼ 5, p > .05, DCFI < .01, indicated that the association between suppression and depressive symptoms was not invariant across gender. This is consistent with the argument of Flynn et al (2010) that gender could moderate the suppressionedepression link and suppression may be more useful in explaining depressive symptoms in boys than in girls. Structural equivalence demonstrates that the relationships between latent variables are similar across gender except for the link between suppression and depressive symptoms.…”
Section: Testing the Structural Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are various strategies that adolescents may use to regulate emotions, in the present study we focused on two commonly used measures of late adolescent and adult emotion regulation: expressive suppression and cognitive reappraisal (Gross, 1998(Gross, , 2002 that have been reliably measured in early to mid-adolescence (Gullone, Hughes, King, & Tonge, 2010;Watson, 2007). Suppression refers to efforts to actively control emotional expressivity and is associated with negative social consequences (Butler et al, 2003), negative emotionality (Butler, Lee, & Gross, 2007), depressive symptoms (Flynn, Hollenstein, & Mackey, 2010;Gross & John, 2003), greater SNS activity (Lam, Dickerson, Zoccola, & Zaldivar, 2009), and less success in actually regulating emotions (Butler et al, 2003). The strategy of reappraisal includes thinking about a situation in different ways to reduce negative emotional reactivity and is associated with better adjustment and well-being (Flynn et al, 2010;Gross & John, 2003).…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suppression refers to efforts to actively control emotional expressivity and is associated with negative social consequences (Butler et al, 2003), negative emotionality (Butler, Lee, & Gross, 2007), depressive symptoms (Flynn, Hollenstein, & Mackey, 2010;Gross & John, 2003), greater SNS activity (Lam, Dickerson, Zoccola, & Zaldivar, 2009), and less success in actually regulating emotions (Butler et al, 2003). The strategy of reappraisal includes thinking about a situation in different ways to reduce negative emotional reactivity and is associated with better adjustment and well-being (Flynn et al, 2010;Gross & John, 2003). Moreover, there is some evidence that the use of suppression tends to decrease with age whereas reappraisal increases (Gullone et al, 2010;John & Gross, 2004).…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%