The effect of supply chain finance on supply chain risk, supply chain risk resilience, and performance of Vietnam SMEs in global supply chain

Nguyen, Duy Nhien; Nguyen, Thi Dieu Hien; Nguyen, Thi Tho; Nguyễn, Xuân Hùng; Do, Thi Kim Thu; Ngo, Hoai Nam

doi:10.5267/j.uscm.2021.9.005

Cited by 11 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A research by Chirambo (2017) showed how microfinance promoted climate change resilience in Africa. Nguyen et al (2022) found that finance strengthened the risk resilience in Vietnam SMEs. Yuan and Li (2022) also disclosed that finance encouraged business resilience in Chinese firms.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sustainable finance and business risk resilience: a conceptual perspective and suggestions for upcoming research

Azadda,

Koomson,

Klutse

2023

XJM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose As public awareness of the concept of sustainable development has increased, a new investor market has appeared. These investors will only make investments in sustainable financial instruments. Yet, how corporate managers can effectively exploit this new financing concept to make their companies risk resilient remains unaddressed. This study, a conceptual research, aims to examine the impact of sustainable finance (SF) on business risk resilience (BR) and the impact of SF on risk management infrastructure (RI). It also addresses the impact of RI on BR and the mediating effect of the former between SF and BR in the corporate world. Finally, this research explores the moderating effect of managerial capability (MC) and firm technology-focused innovation capability (IC) between SF and RI. Design/methodology/approach This study incorporates both theoretical and empirical works in the sustainability, innovation, risk management and HRM fields. Afterwards, it constructs a conceptual model alongside suppositions that can be tested in further studies. Findings This study proposes that SF will enhance BR and RI. Moreover, RI will promote BR and positively intervene between SF and BR. Furthermore, MC and IC will reinforce the SF–RI impact such that the SF–RI impact will be strengthened for companies whose MCs and ICs are high than low. Research limitations/implications This research affords suggestions for researchers in multidisciplinary fields. It reinforces BR and RI by introducing SF, MC and IC as tactical devices. It also serves as a reference point for forthcoming academics to investigate this conceptual model, empirically, in diverse industries worldwide. Practical implications Practical lessons for finance, investment and risk managers, as well as corporate investors are discussed. Originality/value This study provides a new research model that demonstrates how SF can be exploited to promote BR and build RI. It also shows how RI can bolster BR and how RI can connect SF to BR. This new model also exhibits how MC and IC moderate the impacts of SF and RI. Thus, it attempts to advance existing knowledge and theoretical frameworks.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sustainable finance and business risk resilience: a conceptual perspective and suggestions for upcoming research

Azadda,

Koomson,

Klutse

2023

XJM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The results indicate that credit quality, supply chain integration, information exchange, etc., have a significant effect on the performance of SCFs and SMEs. The response of small and medium enterprises in Vietnam to SCF has been measured by Nguyen et al (2022). According to the results, the SCF has a considerable positive influence on supply chain effectiveness, SME performance and supply chain risk resilience.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Supplier selection among manufacturing companies based on their MSME partners’ supply chain finance adoption capability using BWM and VIKOR

Alora,

Gupta

2024

JBIM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify and prioritise supply chain finance (SCF) adoption enablers and develop a novel comprehensive framework to select supplier firms based on their SCF adoption capability. Design/methodology/approach The study deploys a three-phase method to identify and prioritise SCF adoption enablers, followed by developing a model to select suppliers according to their SCF adoption capability. An extensive literature review, followed by a Delphi approach-based expert interview, has been used to finalise the enablers. Using the Best Worst Method and the VIsekriterijumsko KOmpromisno Rangiranje technique, a supplier selection model has been developed in the context of a case company. Findings The financial health and technological advancement variables received the top priority, followed by collaborative efficiency, whereas the human resources and organisational variables received the slightest significance. A supplier selection framework has also been developed by using the adoption capability of these factors by the supplier partners. In this study’s model, Supplier 4 exhibited better SCF adoption capability and received the top priority. Research limitations/implications Manufacturing supply chains in a developing country are the scope of the current study. Extensive future studies are required to derive a global consensus. Practical implications The proposed framework of this study can be used to select supplier firms based on their SCF adoption capability. Policymakers can emphasise the most critical enablers of SCF adoption to assist small supplier firms to be a part of the advanced global supply chains. Originality/value The current study established a novel comprehensive framework for supplier selection based on the Supply Chain Finance adoption capability of MSME supplier firms.

show abstract

“…Though there was only minor growth in 2019, with 3 papers, 2020–21 saw a significant breakthrough in this subject, with 34 papers out of total 46. In the beginning of year 2022, 3 publications by Nguyen et al. (2022), Wilujeng et al.…”

Section: Descriptive Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Though there was only minor growth in 2019, with 3 papers, 2020-21 saw a significant breakthrough in this subject, with 34 papers out of total 46. In the beginning of year 2022, 3 publications by Nguyen et al (2022), Wilujeng et al (2022) and Hossain et al (2022) appeared in the literature, representing a good start in this field. From 2012 to 2022, Figure 2 shows the overall number of publications every year.…”

Section: Timelines and Major Publication Outlets Of Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic literature review on supply chain resilience in SMEs: learnings from COVID-19 pandemic

Mishra

Singh²

2022

IJQRM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe study aims to review state-of-art literature on supply chain resilience in SMEs in the context of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and provides a comprehensive view of insights gained, gaps identified and suggests potential areas of future research.Design/methodology/approachUsing a thorough search strategy, 46 articles were found relevant for this study. Each of these articles was further reviewed, classified and analysed to highlight the development of literature in this field and identify the significant focal area of research in this domain.FindingsThe classification of studies indicates a growing number of articles in the last two years with a significant focus on multiple industries and survey-based research design. The study's findings suggest that literature on supply chain resilience in SMEs falls into four categories: supply chain resilience principle, impact of COVID-19 pandemic on SMEs, strategies for developing supply chain resilience and role of Industry 4.0 technologies in supply chain resilience. We also identified knowledge gaps and suggested directions for future research to catalyse studies at the interface of supply chain resilience, SMEs and COVID-19 pandemic.Research limitations/implicationsThe generalisability of this study can be limited to a specific population of online databases and selected time periods chosen for a particular period.Originality/valueThe study provides a structured literature review on studies published between 2012 and 2022 for the use of academicians and practitioners. Findings will be of great value for SMEs to improve their resilience during the uncertain business environment.

show abstract

The effect of supply chain finance on supply chain risk, supply chain risk resilience, and performance of Vietnam SMEs in global supply chain

Cited by 11 publications

References 33 publications

Sustainable finance and business risk resilience: a conceptual perspective and suggestions for upcoming research

Sustainable finance and business risk resilience: a conceptual perspective and suggestions for upcoming research

Supplier selection among manufacturing companies based on their MSME partners’ supply chain finance adoption capability using BWM and VIKOR

A systematic literature review on supply chain resilience in SMEs: learnings from COVID-19 pandemic

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About