2020
DOI: 10.1186/s40862-020-00092-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of structured versus unstructured collaborative pre-writing task on writing skills of the Iranian EFL students

Abstract: Writing is considered a very complicated task for many EFL students and Iranian EFL learners have many problems in this regard. Present study through a mixed method design, attempted to investigate the effect of Structured Collaborative (SC) pre-writing task versus Unstructured Collaborative (USC) pre-writing task on the writing ability of Iranian EFL students. Among a population of 300 freshmen learners of English language translation of Islamic Azad University, 169 students were selected based on criterion s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, the outcomes are in line with some studies (e.g., Beiki et al, 2020b;Huss, 2018;Shirazifard et al, 2021), which have highlighted the efficacy of collaborative task implementation as a crucial factor in classes. The study results align with some scholars' viewpoints (Beiki et al, 2020a;Neather, 2019;Rashtchi & Beiki, 2015;Fernandez Dobao, 2012), who highlighted the dominant role of group tasks implementation and students' interaction in the learning process.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides, the outcomes are in line with some studies (e.g., Beiki et al, 2020b;Huss, 2018;Shirazifard et al, 2021), which have highlighted the efficacy of collaborative task implementation as a crucial factor in classes. The study results align with some scholars' viewpoints (Beiki et al, 2020a;Neather, 2019;Rashtchi & Beiki, 2015;Fernandez Dobao, 2012), who highlighted the dominant role of group tasks implementation and students' interaction in the learning process.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Concerning translation tasks, back-translation attains a superior quality guarantee, and it assist learners to evaluate the appropriateness of equivalence between source and target manuscripts (McGowan, 2014). Because most EFL students have inadequate vocabulary knowledge and have struggled to state their thoughts, they can be provided with the opportunity to pool and discuss views jointly for task implementation (Beiki et al, 2020a;Rashtchi & Beiki,2015). Educationally, little attention is given to the back-translation as well as collaborative back-translation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the prewriting phase, collaborative tasks through learning together is a proper choice for EFL learners and highlight dynamic discussion between learners with diverse capabilities and background knowledge [23]. Discussion creates a social environment where students can practice critical thinking; the more practice they receive, the higher their performance.…”
Section: A Online Prewriting Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially after the communicative writing movement found its proper position in language teaching (Rashtchi & Keyvanfar, 2010), writing is a difficult skill requiring students to use related skills and sub-skills. To write an English essay, students need knowledge of grammar and terminology on related themes (Beiki, Gharagozloo, & Raissi, 2020;Fitz & Glasgow, 2009). The ability to write efficiently is essential in several academic environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%