1958
DOI: 10.1139/y58-008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Stress and Adrenalectomy on the Response to Dicumarol in Rats

Abstract: The prothrombin time was followed in a large number of rats receiving daily doses of dicumarol. Prothrombin times, using the Schwager–Jaques method, were determined on blood samples obtained from the tail vein. It was found that rats, like rabbits, showed a wide variation in their response to dicumarol at dose levels of 10 and 20 mg./kg. body weight per day but, unlike rabbits, they seemed to develop a tolerance to the drug. This began after a peak prothrombin time was reached and occurred later in rats having… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1968
1968
1971
1971

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chandrasekhar et al (1965) point out that there are conflicting opinions concerning the development of tolerance to dicoumarol by rats. Mogenson, Fisher & Jaques (1958) and Boyd & Warner (1948) concluded that rats developed a tolerance after 1 and 2 weeks dicoumarol treatment respectively, whereas Shitis (1958) found no evidence that rats became tolerant to this anticoagulant following its administration for 5 weeks. Chandrasekhar et al (1965) observed no development of tolerance following short-term administration of dicoumarol but found that tolerance developed during longer term administration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chandrasekhar et al (1965) point out that there are conflicting opinions concerning the development of tolerance to dicoumarol by rats. Mogenson, Fisher & Jaques (1958) and Boyd & Warner (1948) concluded that rats developed a tolerance after 1 and 2 weeks dicoumarol treatment respectively, whereas Shitis (1958) found no evidence that rats became tolerant to this anticoagulant following its administration for 5 weeks. Chandrasekhar et al (1965) observed no development of tolerance following short-term administration of dicoumarol but found that tolerance developed during longer term administration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is usually done by comparison of values for means and standard deviations but as pointed out by Millar et al this may require the use of a log or other transformation to give a normal frequency distribution. Mogenson, Fisher and Jaques (17) concluded that stress generally did not affect the mean prothrombin time of the population but caused an increased variability in individual prothrombin times, which was made more prominent with the increased values after dicumarol.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%