Mechanism of Action 1967
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-46051-7_64
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Streptomycin and Other Aminoglycoside Antibiotics on Protein Synthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
16
1

Year Published

1970
1970
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
2
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Treatment with 100 yg/lml streptomycin sulfate, on the other hand, is reported to reduce bacterial conversion of tryptophan to IAA nearly 100% (25). Although we found that aseptically grown corn coleoptile segments placed in 100 ,tg/ml streptomycin sulfate showed little or no SGR, the tissue also showed little or no growth response to exogenously supplied IAA, suggesting toxic side effects at this level of streptomycin (19). Since the timing of the SGR in A vena and corn is the same in both sterile and nonsterile tissue, and since the magnitude of the SGR in sterile tissue is nearly as great as in nonsterile tissue in the case of corn and even greater in the case of Avena, it seems unlikely that the SGR can be attributed to auxin production by epiphytic bacteria.…”
Section: Methodscontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Treatment with 100 yg/lml streptomycin sulfate, on the other hand, is reported to reduce bacterial conversion of tryptophan to IAA nearly 100% (25). Although we found that aseptically grown corn coleoptile segments placed in 100 ,tg/ml streptomycin sulfate showed little or no SGR, the tissue also showed little or no growth response to exogenously supplied IAA, suggesting toxic side effects at this level of streptomycin (19). Since the timing of the SGR in A vena and corn is the same in both sterile and nonsterile tissue, and since the magnitude of the SGR in sterile tissue is nearly as great as in nonsterile tissue in the case of corn and even greater in the case of Avena, it seems unlikely that the SGR can be attributed to auxin production by epiphytic bacteria.…”
Section: Methodscontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…5-Flurouracil-promoted inhibition of,-galactosidase synthesis could be overcome by cyclic AMP only when the latter was present during the phase of enzyme induction. (11). It has been postulated that streptomycin-induced misreading is not confined to the repair of mutated proteins but inevitably leads to the formation of faulty proteins (8).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best known and most extensively studied agents producing translation errors are 5-fluorouracil and aminoglycoside antibiotics (11,14). Recently, other antibiotics that interfere reversiblywith various aspects of ribosomal function (chloramphenicol, erythromycin, tetracycline, and spectinomycin) were shown to influence, at subinhibitory concentrations, the frequency of misreading (13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…the 70S initiation complex that is known to be responsible for misreading or/and miscoding during protein synthesis (Tanaka, 1975). The chemical moiety responsible for misreading is the streptamine nucleus, which is an intrinsic part orthe structure of AG (Jacoby and Gorini, 1967). Overall, AG affect the three phases of the protein sYQthesis process: they affect the peptide chain initiation by blocking the 30S initiation complex formation and by inhibiting the ribosomal dissociation (non-reversible binding) and they induce misreading of the genetic code ofthe bacteria during the elongation and the tennination phases of protein synthesis (Jacoby and Gorini, 1967).…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%