1993
DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(93)90058-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of stimulation rate on the signal-to-noise ratio of evoked responses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to Blankenburg et al (2003), who studied the compound neuronal activity of the stimulus pair because individual responses to prime and test stimuli cannot be disentangled in fMRI due to the long time constant of the BOLD response, we presented stimulus pairs with ISIs ≥150 ms that enabled us to study cortical responses to the individual stimuli without any overlap of cortical activations (Ahlfors et al, 1993).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to Blankenburg et al (2003), who studied the compound neuronal activity of the stimulus pair because individual responses to prime and test stimuli cannot be disentangled in fMRI due to the long time constant of the BOLD response, we presented stimulus pairs with ISIs ≥150 ms that enabled us to study cortical responses to the individual stimuli without any overlap of cortical activations (Ahlfors et al, 1993).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such a case, the noise should be inversely proportional to the square root of the number of trials [31]. While this is roughly true for the EEG [32], we also need to take into account that some of the noise might depend on the amplitude of the P300 and thus on the stimulus probability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Moreover, we used a 4.3–4.8 s interstimulus interval (ISI) between pulse trains because previous MEG studies have found that: (1) the benefit of longer ISIs falls off exponentially after ∼4.0 s (Ahlfors et al . ; Raij et al . ); (2) studies of somatosensory responses from the secondary cortices have found such responses are strongest when using ISIs around 5.0 s (Wikström et al .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%