2021
DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20200928-01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of State Legislation on Opioid Prescriptions Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

Abstract: New Jersey State Law, P.L. 2017 Chapter 28 22, C.24:21–15.2, passed in February 2017, is the most restrictive opioid legislation passed thus far in the United States. This study evaluated the effects of this legislation on the postoperative opioid prescriptions of patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR). Opioid prescriptions were compared following arthroscopic RCR before and after implementation of the new law using the New Jersey Prescription Monitoring Program Aware Drug Database. A conse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this study are inconsistent with null findings from prior evaluations of the laws using general population samples, 4,5 but are broadly consistent with single-state evaluations that have concluded that prescribing cap laws have reduced the amount of opioids prescribed postsurgically. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] The discrepancy in results may be because most laws are intended to govern prescriptions for acute pain like postsurgical pain, whereas general population samples include a mix of people being treated for acute and chronic pain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results of this study are inconsistent with null findings from prior evaluations of the laws using general population samples, 4,5 but are broadly consistent with single-state evaluations that have concluded that prescribing cap laws have reduced the amount of opioids prescribed postsurgically. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] The discrepancy in results may be because most laws are intended to govern prescriptions for acute pain like postsurgical pain, whereas general population samples include a mix of people being treated for acute and chronic pain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emerging literature on the effects of these laws on postsurgical opioid prescribing has suggested they have reduced the amount of opioids prescribed. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] Most studies evaluated a single state's law using data from a single institution. No study has evaluated the overall effects of prescribing cap laws on postsurgical prescribing across all states that have implemented them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the percentage of patients who received at least one new opioid prescription The sharp drop-off in opioid prescribing observed in 2018 is likely attributable to state legislation passed in 2017 which limited opioid prescribing for acute pain, required prescribers to check the state's PDMP database before prescribing opioids, and mandated continuing education regarding best practices for prescribing controlled substances. Although other studies have documented reductions in opioid prescribing after the enactment of state opioid-limiting legislation for common orthopaedic surgeries, 13,[23][24][25][26][27][28] the patient populations in these studies were fairly homogenous. By contrast, the patient population in this study included a high proportion of Black patients and individuals with Medicaid insurance, both risk factors for prolonged opioid use after surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…There were similar numbers of males (47%) and females (53%). The majority of patients number of doses by Periods 1, 2, 3 were 44(25, 70); 20(14,28); and 19(15,25), respectively. There is significant variability in the number of doses per prescription, particularly in Period 1, which is supported by SMD >0.1 between groups.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%