1989
DOI: 10.1002/app.1989.070370302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of spinning speed and drawing temperature on structure and properties of poly(ethylene terephthalate) yarns

Abstract: SynopsisFrom an industrial point of view, it is effective to have a relation between process conditions and resulting product properties. In practice there are many possible process conditions, whereas properties are generally interrelated in a complex way. Thus, there is a strong need for a physical understanding of the product properties in terms of process settings. This comprehension should also allow one to predict possible consequences for the properties when new process conditions become available. To o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(1 reference statement)
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is generally believed that in PET yarns shrinkage is a unique function of the product of amorphous volume fraction and amorphous orientation factor. 37 When the thermal shrinkage is plotted as a function of (1-X c ) fam, where X c is the crystalline fraction and fam the amorphous orientation factor, the two sets of samples appear to form two distinct populations (Fig. 4) showing that for the same value of (1-X c ) fam, the tautannealed samples show a higher shrinkage than the free-annealed samples.…”
Section: Thermal Shrinkagementioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is generally believed that in PET yarns shrinkage is a unique function of the product of amorphous volume fraction and amorphous orientation factor. 37 When the thermal shrinkage is plotted as a function of (1-X c ) fam, where X c is the crystalline fraction and fam the amorphous orientation factor, the two sets of samples appear to form two distinct populations (Fig. 4) showing that for the same value of (1-X c ) fam, the tautannealed samples show a higher shrinkage than the free-annealed samples.…”
Section: Thermal Shrinkagementioning
confidence: 97%
“…These morphological effects appear to be particularly important for semicrystalline polymer fibers, where comparatively small structural changes lead to differences in important properties such as strength, modulus, thermal shrinkage, fatigue resistance, and diffusion properties. [1][2][3][4][5] Quantitative characterization of the semicrystalline structure is, therefore, of a great importance to advance our understanding of fiber properties. In this respect, the fraction of crystalline material (i.e., crystallinity) is probably one of the most important morphological parameters, Summary: The phase composition and molecular mobility of Nylon 6 fibers has been studied using 1 H solid-state NMR transverse magnetization relaxation (T 2 relaxation) spectroscopy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the above-mentioned papers the Raman spectra are related to the structural parameters of PET. From previous studies it is also known that the (thermo-)mechanical properties are determined by the physical structure of the yarn (Heuvel et a/. Huisman and Heuvel, 1989;de Weijer, 1995). In the study presented from our laboratories we determine a (thenno-)mechanical property (SHA190) of PET directly from the Raman spectrum.…”
Section: Raman Spectroscopy On Petmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The dimensional stability is expressed as the percentage shrinkage after heat treatment in hot air at 190'C without any tension (SHA190). The yarn shrinkage is proportional to the amount of amorphous material and to the orientation of the polymer chains in the amorphous regions (Huisman and Heuvel, 1989).…”
Section: Crystalline Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%