2017
DOI: 10.1111/cxo.12458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of spectacle treatment in patients with mild traumatic brain injury: a pilot study

Abstract: This pilot study found that spectacle treatment, specifically directed at optimising near task visual function, significantly reduced symptoms in 50 per cent of patients and improved reading performance in 50 per cent. While promising, lack of placebo control and lack of correlation between reading performance and symptom improvements means we cannot decipher mechanisms without further study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Acute and chronic (including post-mTBI syndrome) mTBI cohorts were reviewed, but studies without a diagnosis of an mTBI [i.e., repetitive head injuries or those with a self-reported history of head injuries with no current symptoms or recent referral to study by a clinician (Rizzo et al, 2016)] were excluded. Rehabilitation studies that did not include a baseline examination, or did not include any cross-sectional comparison to healthy controls were not reviewed (Kaldoja et al, 2015;Johansson et al, 2017). Only articles written in English were considered for review and any abstracts, case studies, reviews, book chapters, commentaries, discussion papers, editorials or conference proceedings were excluded.…”
Section: Inclusion and Exclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acute and chronic (including post-mTBI syndrome) mTBI cohorts were reviewed, but studies without a diagnosis of an mTBI [i.e., repetitive head injuries or those with a self-reported history of head injuries with no current symptoms or recent referral to study by a clinician (Rizzo et al, 2016)] were excluded. Rehabilitation studies that did not include a baseline examination, or did not include any cross-sectional comparison to healthy controls were not reviewed (Kaldoja et al, 2015;Johansson et al, 2017). Only articles written in English were considered for review and any abstracts, case studies, reviews, book chapters, commentaries, discussion papers, editorials or conference proceedings were excluded.…”
Section: Inclusion and Exclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Johansson et al . 24 used an eye tracker as a tool for assessing the reading performance of patients after mild TBI before and after spectacle treatment. However, patients participating in that study were fully conscious and the study focused on visual dysfunction rather than on the reading comprehension and syntactic/spelling skills.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%