2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Specimen Dimension on the Results of the Split-hopkinson Tension Bar Testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e development of a method to test material to be in tension under high strain-rates (later called Split Hopkinson Tension Bar, SHTB) was introduced a decade later after the SHPB [51,52]. e progress in using SHTB was very slow due to difficulties inherent in sample design, load application, and data interpretation.…”
Section: ) Split-hopkinson Tension Bar (Shtb)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e development of a method to test material to be in tension under high strain-rates (later called Split Hopkinson Tension Bar, SHTB) was introduced a decade later after the SHPB [51,52]. e progress in using SHTB was very slow due to difficulties inherent in sample design, load application, and data interpretation.…”
Section: ) Split-hopkinson Tension Bar (Shtb)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the THEDS geometry requires properly shaped bar ends (as well as double threaded ends specimen) that can be obtained by wire electrical-discharge machining, as reported in Figure 1b that presents a diagram of the sample-bar assembly. The cyan component (2) is simply an alignment tool and, therefore, does not contribute to the load transmission, unless adhesive is used. Figure 2 reports the final realization of the THEDS b a geometry with a fixtures example (Figure 2a) and the components for quasi-static/low strainrate test performed on a universal testing machine (MTS 810).…”
Section: Tensile Hopkinson Extruded Design Sample (Theds)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This solution minimizes the mass of the specimen and guarantees a robust connection to the equipment bars. Several numerical studies assessed the performances of this topology and provided indications to optimize it in different testing conditions and for different materials (see [2] for an example). The two main drawbacks of this configuration are related to specimen manufacturing and test operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the geometry and dimension of specimens have important effect on material characteristics. Prabowo et al [8] conducted the influence of specimen geometry on the material dynamic behavior using LS -DYNA software. The research applied on three different geometry material of dumbbell shape like ASTM A370 for 6, 8, and 8 of gage length with different diameter size using Johnsoncook model and the result showing the ratio of (L/d =0.75) having perfect strain and stress characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%