1993
DOI: 10.1016/0168-1591(93)90095-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of space restriction and provision of toys during rearing on the behaviour, productivity and physiology of male pigs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
53
3
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
53
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An increased amount of exploration of novel objects by P pigs than E pigs was shown before (24,30), possibly because P pigs have an unsatisfied motivation for exploration (30). During the isolation test in this experiment, E and P pigs did not differ in the time spent in exploration; however, the stress caused by isolation may have reduced the motivation of the pigs to explore the new environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An increased amount of exploration of novel objects by P pigs than E pigs was shown before (24,30), possibly because P pigs have an unsatisfied motivation for exploration (30). During the isolation test in this experiment, E and P pigs did not differ in the time spent in exploration; however, the stress caused by isolation may have reduced the motivation of the pigs to explore the new environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Studies have shown that space restriction (1,20,24) or regular handling (14) not only affect behavioral but also physiological responses in growing pigs. Although it is known that environmental enrichment improves pig welfare by limiting manipulative social behavior and improving social skills (2,3,6,29), it is unknown if physiological responses of pigs to stressors are affected by environmental enrichment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, relative to cubs housed alone in cages, cubs housed in enclosures had higher serum cortisol level after ACTH administration and heavier adrenals (Selye 1950). Although there is some divergency in interpretation of the results based on the ACTH challenge test (Rushen 1991), many research reports support the view that the increased response to ACTH can be used as a measure of long-term stress (Fraser and Broom 1990;Broom and Johnson 1993;Terlouw et al 1997) in several animal species (e.g., pigs -Meunier- Salaun et al 1987;Pearce and Paterson 1993;Hemsworth et al 1996: catsCarlstead et al 1993: red deer -Goddard et al 1994: calves -Veissier et al 1997) including farmed silver foxes (Rekilä et al 1999) and that it is more a valid measure and less subject to errors than baseline cortisol measure. Therefore, our result with higher serum cortisol level after ACTH administration and heavier adrenals in E cubs than in C cubs may indicate a higher stress level in cubs housed in enclosures, apparently as a result of social stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Around 119 days of age 39 animals (19 wt, 20 GFP) were individually tested regarding general activity in and their reaction to an unfamiliar environment (Open Field tests -OF1, OF2), an unfamiliar object (Novel Object Test -NOT) and an unfamiliar human (Human Approach Test -HAT) following adapted protocols from Pearce and Paterson (Pearce and Paterson 1993). At the end of the tests, the number of faecal boli was counted and the arena dry cleaned before testing the next animal.…”
Section: Open Field Novel Object and Human Approach Test -Exploratormentioning
confidence: 99%