1994
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.1994.1006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Small Quantities of Calcium on the Adsorption of Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate and Calcium at the Gas-Liquid Interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
45
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
8
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several authors find that the results of the Gibbs adsorption isotherm and independent adsorbed density measurements agree well, thus seeming to simultaneously support both the equation and their experiments (10,(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). Others have found that in general the calculated densities underestimate the measured densities and have attributed this fact to divalent impurities not taken into account in the calculation (21)(22)(23). Although little work has been reported for gemini surfactants, there is significant discussion regarding whether m, in the absence of added electrolyte, should indeed be equal to a value of m = 3 or equal to a value of m = 2, suggesting that only one counterion associates with the divalent surfactant head group (24,25).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Several authors find that the results of the Gibbs adsorption isotherm and independent adsorbed density measurements agree well, thus seeming to simultaneously support both the equation and their experiments (10,(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). Others have found that in general the calculated densities underestimate the measured densities and have attributed this fact to divalent impurities not taken into account in the calculation (21)(22)(23). Although little work has been reported for gemini surfactants, there is significant discussion regarding whether m, in the absence of added electrolyte, should indeed be equal to a value of m = 3 or equal to a value of m = 2, suggesting that only one counterion associates with the divalent surfactant head group (24,25).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…However, the surface potential and surface excess determined by different experimental techniques do not agree well. The discrepancies in surface excess between NR, radiotracer, and tensiometry are a well-known but not yet resolved issue [136,137], as discussed in detail by Xu et al [138,139]. The discrepancy between the surface potential determined by different techniques is even bigger.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscript 50mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, contamination was shown explicitly by Cross and Jayson who used radiotracers to identify the presence of Ca 2+ in adsorbed sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). 11 Contamination at a low level by Ca 2+ ions leads to a Gibbs prefactor of 3 for the divalent surfactant salt with an approximately halved surfactant ion coverage because there are two surfactant ions in the divalent salt. The nett result is that the apparent Gibbs prefactor is approximately 3/2 instead of the expected value of 2, and this leads to a substantial underestimate of the coverage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%