2010
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Slow Electrical Stimuli to Achieve Learning in Cultured Networks of Rat Cortical Neurons

Abstract: Learning, or more generally, plasticity may be studied using cultured networks of rat cortical neurons on multi electrode arrays. Several protocols have been proposed to affect connectivity in such networks. One of these protocols, proposed by Shahaf and Marom, aimed to train the input-output relationship of a selected connection in a network using slow electrical stimuli. Although the results were quite promising, the experiments appeared difficult to repeat and the training protocol did not serve as a basis … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

9
86
0
11

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(45 reference statements)
9
86
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Диссоциированные культуры нейрональных клеток, выращенные на мультиэлектродных матрицах, представляют собой одну из современных моделей исследования механизмов кодирования информации, нейрональной пластичности, обучения и памяти в мозге на сетевом уровне in vitro [1, 2,3]. Планарные микроэлектроды таких мультиэлектродных матриц позволяют непрерывно регистрировать биоэлектрическую активность клеток и одновременно воздействовать электрическими стимулами на клетки в разных участках нейронной сети.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Диссоциированные культуры нейрональных клеток, выращенные на мультиэлектродных матрицах, представляют собой одну из современных моделей исследования механизмов кодирования информации, нейрональной пластичности, обучения и памяти в мозге на сетевом уровне in vitro [1, 2,3]. Планарные микроэлектроды таких мультиэлектродных матриц позволяют непрерывно регистрировать биоэлектрическую активность клеток и одновременно воздействовать электрическими стимулами на клетки в разных участках нейронной сети.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Однако, при частоте стимуляции 1-5 Гц большинство стимулов не вызывает пачек импульсов или ответ сети со временем уменьшается [13,14,3]. Показано, что низкочастотная стимуляция не вызывает ни кратковременных ни долгосрочных изменений функциональной структуры нейронной сети и ответа на стимул [15].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Dissociated neural cell cultures are widely used as an experimental model for long-term studies of synaptic plasticity in neuronal networks, learning and memory [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. This model makes it possible to carry out longterm monitoring of bioelectrical functional activity and morphological changes in neural networks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a significant number of studies devoted to activity-induced plasticity in dissociated brain cell networks cultured for a long time on microelectrode arrays. The most common electrical stimulation protocols are closedloop stimulation (stimulation depending on network responses) [1][2][3][4], low-frequency stimulation (1-0.5 Hz) [5,6] and high frequency tetanic stimulation [7][8][9][10] based on spike timing dependent plasticity (STDP).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed paradigm represents an innovative, simplified and controllable bidirectional closed loop system where it is possible to investigate the dynamic and adaptive properties of a neural population interacting with an external environment by means of an artificial body (i.e., the mobile robot). Similar closed-loop approaches have been used to quantify the complexity of neural dynamics (Kositsky et al, 2009), to investigate the transition among different electrophysiological regimes (Wagenaar et al, 2005) and to investigate basic mechanisms of learning (Shahaf and Marom, 2001;le Feber et al, 2010). Closed-loop experiments are also relevant to the technology of neural interfaces (MussaIvaldi and Miller, 2003;Nicolelis, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%