1980
DOI: 10.1016/0301-7516(80)90035-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of slime coatings of the serpentine minerals, chrysotile and lizardite, on pentlandite flotation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
44
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
3
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the presence of chelating group, the addition of sodium pyrophosphate may promote the formation of metal ion-pyrophosphate, preventing its reaction with collector [20]. It was demonstrated that sodium pyrophosphate could reduce the adverse effect of serpentine on the flotation of pentlandite by shifting the slime surface charge [21]. In addition, sodium pyrophosphate has also been used in scheelite flotation [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the presence of chelating group, the addition of sodium pyrophosphate may promote the formation of metal ion-pyrophosphate, preventing its reaction with collector [20]. It was demonstrated that sodium pyrophosphate could reduce the adverse effect of serpentine on the flotation of pentlandite by shifting the slime surface charge [21]. In addition, sodium pyrophosphate has also been used in scheelite flotation [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Economic beneficiation of the Ni ores containing large amounts of serpentines (Mg silicates) has been a longstanding challenging problem in the mineral industry (Claridge and Tenbergen, 1975;Edwards et. al., 1980;Eltham, J.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig 2.3 shows that in neutral and weakly alkaline solutions, pentlandite is negatively charged, but serpentine is positively charged, resulting in electrostatic interaction between them. The coating of serpentine minerals on pentlandite surfaces explains the poor flotation behaviour of pentlandite as shown in Fig 2.4 (Edwards, G.R., 1980;Bremmell, K.E., 2005). Hydrophilic silicate slime coatings on valuable sulphide minerals reduce surface wettability and thus decrease both the flotation rate and recovery of sulphide minerals.…”
Section: Slime Coatings On Valuable Minerals In Flotationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is agreed with the measurement in other literatures (Arnold and Aplan, 1986;Vane and Zang, 1997 The electrostatic attraction between gangue and valuable minerals has been reported to attribute to slime coatings. It has been well documented that clay slime coatings occur on galena, coal and bitumen surfaces through the electrostatic attraction, reduce surface hydrophobicity and then depress the flotation significantly (Arnold and Aplan, 1986b;Edwards et al, 1980).…”
Section: Slime Coatings On Valuable Minerals In Flotationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation