2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-005-1716-2
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of silica nano particles and rubber particles on the toughness of multiphase thermosetting epoxy polymers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
183
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 276 publications
(190 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
183
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, despite the relatively high silica content of 26 vol%, the nanofilled epoxy resin still has a comparatively low viscosity due to the agglomerate-free colloidal dispersion of the nanoparticles in the resin. The small diameter and good dispersion of the nanoparticles of silica have been previously reported and shown [15,16].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, despite the relatively high silica content of 26 vol%, the nanofilled epoxy resin still has a comparatively low viscosity due to the agglomerate-free colloidal dispersion of the nanoparticles in the resin. The small diameter and good dispersion of the nanoparticles of silica have been previously reported and shown [15,16].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…This is via the addition of a nanophase structure in the polymer, where the nanophase consists of small rigid particles of silica [15][16][17][18]. Such nanoparticle-modified epoxies have been shown to not only increase further the toughness of the epoxy polymer but also, due to the very small size of the silica particles, not to lead to a significant increase in the viscosity of the epoxy monomer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the synergistic effect of having a multiphase structure based upon both silica nanoparticles and micron-sized rubbery domains is again demonstrated [12,13].…”
Section: Mode II Fracture Performance Of the Compositesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The mode I interlaminar fracture energy values for the various formulations of GFRP are plotted against the corresponding values for the bulk material, as reported by Kinloch et al [13], in Figure 1. These data show that the fracture energy of the composites prepared with the control, and the CTBN-or nanosilica-modified formulations is greater than the bulk value of G IC .…”
Section: Mode I Fracture Performance: Interlaminar Versus Bulkmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, reductions in strain-to-failure, impact resistance, and fracture toughness are major limitations of such fillers. [6][7][8][9] The composite properties strongly rely on the volume of fillers in the matrix as well as the filler size. To improve the composite mechanical properties, the fillers must have maximum contact with the matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%