2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12187-019-09673-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Sibship Size on Children’s Outcomes: Evidence from Vietnam

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In summary, the direction of the effect of number of children on migration for either the whole family or individual parents is ambiguous. Although there are many empirical studies on the trade-off between quantity and quality of children (see the review from Mont, Nguyen, & Tran, 2019), for example and the effect of children on parental employment (see reviews from Akgunduz & Plantenga, 2018), and Blau & Currie, 2006 , there is little empirical evidence on the effect of children on migration. Moreover, the limited empirical evidence that exists offers only mixed conclusions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, the direction of the effect of number of children on migration for either the whole family or individual parents is ambiguous. Although there are many empirical studies on the trade-off between quantity and quality of children (see the review from Mont, Nguyen, & Tran, 2019), for example and the effect of children on parental employment (see reviews from Akgunduz & Plantenga, 2018), and Blau & Currie, 2006 , there is little empirical evidence on the effect of children on migration. Moreover, the limited empirical evidence that exists offers only mixed conclusions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are clearly not valid instruments because the chance of a twin birth increases with the number of births. The positive association between this IV and the realized number of children will also make it positively associated with the desired number of children and, therefore, with other important confounding factors.For the same reason, versions of this specification, such as any twin birth as a second or subsequent birth(Frenette 2011a, b) or any twin birth among younger siblings(Dasgupta and Solomon 2018;Fletcher and Kim 2019;Mont et al 2020), will also not be valid. Defining the IV as an indicator for a twin birth in the first two parities (as used in Moschion 2010; Chen 2017) does not produce an interpretable effect and is therefore also invalid.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%