I
FOREWORDThe Human Factors Technical Area of the Army Research Institute (ARI) is concerned with the demands of the future battlefield for increased man-machine complexity to acquire, transmit, process, disseminate, and utilize information. The research is focused on the interface problems and interactions within command and control centers and is concerned with such areas as topographic products and procedures, tactical symbology, information management, user-oriented systems, staff operations and procedures, and sensor systems integration and utilization.One area of special interest is that of human factors problems in the design of topographic products and procedures. Maps are an essential part of a large number of military tasks at all staff levels. Many map users report, and have, difficulty in visualizing terrain features from current maps which use contour lines to portray relief. Methods for supplementing contour lines with other relief formats have been developed but assessing the value of supplementing contour lines with other modes of relief portrayal remains a problem. In order to make a decision regarding the cost-benefits tradeoff of supplementing contour lines, the map designer must have some idea of how different supplementary relief formats will affect user performance. This publication presents a technique for assessing map relief legibility and reports initial findings from employing this technique to evaluate use of shading and layer tints as supplementary relief formats. The results of this initial work indicate that adding layer tints to contour lines is beneficial for some types of map reading tests. However, addition of shaded relief to contour line maps offers no advantages over the addition of layer tints, and can decrease performance for some tasks. To develop an appropriate methodology and carry out an assessment of the legibility of different relief formats.
Procedure and Findings:The types of relief information that must be extracted by representative users of hardcopy maps were analyzed. Using the results of this analysis, a Relief Assessment Test was designed to determine the merits of supplementing contour lines with other relief formats. The Relief Assessment Test contains eight types of problems: landform identification, ridge-valley identification, slope identification, identification of high-low areas on the map, spot elevation problems, vertical profile identification, terrain visualization, and defilade. Use of the Relief Assessment Test assumes previous experience and training in the use of contour line maps, but the test does contain a review of zelevant aspects of map reading. When this test is administered as a self-paced test, subjects typically take 3 to 5 hours.The Relief Assessment Test was produced in three foxmatsi contour lines, contour lines plus layer tints, and contour lines plus shading. Initial research was undertaken to assess these three map formats empirically. Subjects were 48 Army officers and NCOs experienced in reading contour maps and using them for...