1945
DOI: 10.2527/jas1945.4115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Sex on Weaning Weight of Range Calves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

1964
1964
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, gender was not a significant covariate for weaning variables (P ≥ 0.45). Although steers are expected to have greater weaning BW compared with heifers (Koger and Knox, 1945), steers and heifers had similar (P ≥ 0.45) weaning age (182 vs. 183 d [SEM 3], respectively), weaning BW (223 vs. 224 kg [SEM 5], respectively), and 205-d adjusted weaning BW (254 vs. 252 kg [SEM 5], respectively) in the present experiment. Therefore, treatment effects detected for weaning BW variables should also not be associated with the greater (P ≤ 0.05) proportion of male calves born from INR and AAC cows (Table 6).…”
Section: Calf Birth and Weaning Parametersmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Nevertheless, gender was not a significant covariate for weaning variables (P ≥ 0.45). Although steers are expected to have greater weaning BW compared with heifers (Koger and Knox, 1945), steers and heifers had similar (P ≥ 0.45) weaning age (182 vs. 183 d [SEM 3], respectively), weaning BW (223 vs. 224 kg [SEM 5], respectively), and 205-d adjusted weaning BW (254 vs. 252 kg [SEM 5], respectively) in the present experiment. Therefore, treatment effects detected for weaning BW variables should also not be associated with the greater (P ≤ 0.05) proportion of male calves born from INR and AAC cows (Table 6).…”
Section: Calf Birth and Weaning Parametersmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…, 1942and Woolfolk and Knapp, 1949). Sex differences in weaning weight have also been reported by many workers (Burgess et al, 1954;Gregory et al, 1950;Koch, 1951;Koch and Clark, 1955a;Koger and Knox, 1945;Rollins and Guilbert, 1954;Rollins and Wagnon, 1956;Swiger, 1960Swiger, , 1961and Woolfolk and Knapp, 1949). Swiger (1960) Nelms and Bogart (1955) reported that bull calves decrease in ef ficiency more rapidly than heifers as they grow in body weight from 500 to 800 pounds.…”
Section: Effect Of Sexsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…As would be expected, the largest constants were observed for 2, 3, and 4 year old dams. Koch (1951) In several studies where the calves were weaned at 205 days the males exceeded the females by 26, 30, 29, 34 and 32 pounds (Koger and Knox, 1945a;Koger and Knox, 1947;Rice et al , 1954;Reynolds _et al , 1958;Meade jet , 1961), respectively. Similar values for calves weaned at 210 days were 25, 22 and 17, 38, 46, 39 pounds (Botkin and Whatley, 1953;Evans et al,.…”
Section: Age Of Dammentioning
confidence: 98%
“…(1955) and Chambers _et (1956). Minyard and Dinkel (1960) The other most common methods of correcting for age of calf are by covariance analysis (Koger and Knox, 1945a) or by the regression of weight on age within year, sex, and age of dam subclass groups (Koger and Knox, 1945b;Koger and Knox, 1947). …”
Section: Personnel Associated With Federal Experiments Stations Weanmentioning
confidence: 99%