2016
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of seed traits on geographic variation in body size and sexual size dimorphism of the seed‐feeding beetle Acanthoscelides macrophthalmus

Abstract: Explaining large‐scale patterns of variation in body size has been considered a central question in ecology and evolutionary biology because several life‐history traits are directly linked to body size. For ectothermic organisms, little is known about what processes influence geographic variation in body size. Changes in body size and sexual size dimorphism (SSD) have been associated with environmental variables, particularly for Bruchinae insects, which feed exclusively on seeds during the larval stage. Howev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(188 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EL was estimated by calculating the mean value from the longest portion of both elytra. EW was estimated by the mean value obtained from the widest portion of both elytra, and PW corresponded to the widest pronotum portion (Colgoni & Vamosi, 2006;Stillwell et al, 2007b;Haga & Rossi, 2016).…”
Section: Body Size and Ssdmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…EL was estimated by calculating the mean value from the longest portion of both elytra. EW was estimated by the mean value obtained from the widest portion of both elytra, and PW corresponded to the widest pronotum portion (Colgoni & Vamosi, 2006;Stillwell et al, 2007b;Haga & Rossi, 2016).…”
Section: Body Size and Ssdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although most SSD studies considered an interspecific approach (e.g., Colwell, ; Monnet & Cherry, ), other studies have shown that SSD may vary substantially within a species (Teder & Tammaru, ; Fairbairn, ) because, for example, females and males respond differently to resource quality (Stockhoff, ; Teder & Tammaru, ). For bruchines, some findings suggest that females exhibit greater phenotypic plasticity relative to body size than males as females are more vulnerable when growing on poor hosts and when resources are scarce (Moreau et al, ; Stillwell et al, ; Haga & Rossi, ). Therefore, it is relevant to determine how bruchines of both sexes respond to certain ecological processes, such as competition and variation in resource quality, affecting the degree of SSD (Fairbairn, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations