2005
DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200502000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Screening for Deep Vein Thrombosis on the Prevalence of Pulmonary Embolism in Patients With Fractures of the Pelvis or Acetabulum

Abstract: Discontinuation of screening for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis did not change the rate of pulmonary embolism.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
26
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Our screening strategy was useful, as the detection rate of VTE in patients with pelvic fractures was high, as other reports, 5,7,10,11 whereas the detection rate of PTE was also high despite the patients being asymptomatic. The high prevalence of PTE in patients with pelvic fractures indicates that screening should be performed as early as possible before PTE becomes symptomatic.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Our screening strategy was useful, as the detection rate of VTE in patients with pelvic fractures was high, as other reports, 5,7,10,11 whereas the detection rate of PTE was also high despite the patients being asymptomatic. The high prevalence of PTE in patients with pelvic fractures indicates that screening should be performed as early as possible before PTE becomes symptomatic.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Among trauma patients, serial screening for DVT failed to identify patients before they developed symptomatic or fatal PE Borer, 2005;Haut, 2007, Moed, 2012). These studies demonstrate that routine screening will detect more asymptomatic DVTs but does not reduce symptomatic thromboembolic events.…”
Section: We Suggest That Sci Patients Not Be Routinely Screened With mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The costs of DVT screening are substantial, and routine screening of trauma patients has been shown to not be cost-effective (Borer, 2005;Jawa, 2011;Sud, 2011). Among high-risk trauma patients who were given thromboprophylaxis with LMWH, the addition of either serial DUS screening or insertion of an IVC filter was determined to cost more than USD $100,000 per nonfatal PE prevented (Brasel, 1997).…”
Section: We Suggest That Sci Patients Not Be Routinely Screened With mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turkiye Klinikleri J Intern Med 2016;1 (1) 68 tected thrombus, pancreas, ovary, liver, and brain malignancies are developing. 3 In some cases, it is emphasized that thrombus is developing after vasculopathies.…”
Section: Multiple Vascular Thrombus Case After Tibial Fractures: Lettmentioning
confidence: 99%