2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of Schmidt hammer type on uniaxial compressive strength prediction of rock

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
2
7

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
31
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the International Society for Rock Mechanics (ISRM 1978) the L-type hammer, which has the lower impact energy, should be used for the hardness characterization for rocks having uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) between 20 and 150 MPa. On the other hand some authors suggest that the N-type hammer outperforms the L-type (Buyuksagis and Goktan 2007), because of the higher impact energy. The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM 2001) does not prefer a specific hammer type at all.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the International Society for Rock Mechanics (ISRM 1978) the L-type hammer, which has the lower impact energy, should be used for the hardness characterization for rocks having uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) between 20 and 150 MPa. On the other hand some authors suggest that the N-type hammer outperforms the L-type (Buyuksagis and Goktan 2007), because of the higher impact energy. The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM 2001) does not prefer a specific hammer type at all.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the samples used in the cutting tests were approximately 1.7-1.9 kg in weight, having a length of 150 mm, and 150 mm × 30 mm section. Some mechanical properties of the tested rocks are given in Table 1, together with their mineralogical compositions obtained from thin sections Table 2 [14]. The mechanical tests were performed according to related ISRM suggested methods [15] and testing procedures of the used instruments.…”
Section: Design Of Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The operation of the device is based on the principle that the rebound of an elastic mass impacting on a surface depends on its hardness and thus the harder the surface the higher is the rebound distance [37]. Several societies, including the International Society for Rock Mechanics [38,39] and the American Society for Testing and Materials [40], have proposed test methods and standards, respectively, for the proper operation of the device [41]. Other options for determining such material properties with the use of the Schmidt hammer have also been proposed [42][43][44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%