2015
DOI: 10.17654/ijnmamar2015_001_020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Sample Size and the Number of Items on Reliability Coefficients: Alpha and Rhô: A Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
15
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The internal consistency of some of the intentions subscales fell below the generally recommended standard of 0.7. However, it must be considered that these are largely 3‐ and 4‐item scales, and alpha tends to increase with the number of items (e.g., Abdelmoula, Chakroun, & Akrout, ). Furthermore, it is generally accepted that a lower alpha value will tend to under‐ rather than overestimate associations with the dependent variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The internal consistency of some of the intentions subscales fell below the generally recommended standard of 0.7. However, it must be considered that these are largely 3‐ and 4‐item scales, and alpha tends to increase with the number of items (e.g., Abdelmoula, Chakroun, & Akrout, ). Furthermore, it is generally accepted that a lower alpha value will tend to under‐ rather than overestimate associations with the dependent variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The internal consistency of some of the intentions and helping actions subscales fell below the broadly accepted minimum of α = 0.7. However, it must be considered that these are largely 3-and 4-item scales, and alpha tends to increase with the number of items [35]. Furthermore, a lower alpha value is likely to lead to underestimating, rather than overestimating associations.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The questionnaire took its final form after the modifications were made. Abdelmoula et al ( 2015 ) confirmed that sample size has a positive effect on reliability. Also, some other researchers have found that the sample size has an effect on reliability (Bonett, 2002 ; Charter, 2003 ; Duhachek et al, 2005 ; Helms et.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%