The Effect of Room Size and General Ventilation on the Relationship Between Near and Far-Field Concentrations

Abstract

Measurements of personal exposure level are generally greater than or equal to concentrations found at some fixed location in the body of the workroom. This article presents a theoretical analysis of such differences using a simple model of exposure, implemented as a two-compartment mass balance model with a constant emission rate. Simulated exposure levels (termed the near-field) and the concentration at a fixed location (the far-field) were obtained for five room sizes (30 to 3000 m3), each with five general ventilation rates (0.3 to 30 air-changes per hour) and three levels of air movement in the vicinity of the worker (generally 3 to 30 m3/min). The ratio of near- to far-field concentrations from the simulations ranged from unity in small poorly ventilated rooms to 24 in large well ventilated areas, which compares favorably with actual measurement data. The predicted concentrations obtained in small rooms (< 100 m3) with less than one air-change per hour were almost 40 times higher than in larger rooms. The results from these simulations have been used to modify the original exposure model to better reflect the likely effect of general ventilation on workers' exposure.

The importance of reliable exposure estimates in deciding whether trichloroethylene can cause kidney cancer

“…In addition, we have used a structured subjective assessment method, as described by Cherrie (1999), to provide an alternative assessment of the likely exposures. Our calculations suggest the trichloroethylene exposure level during cleaning would have been approximately 1,800±4,000 ppm for the maximum usage 23,000 l per year (assuming that all trichloroethylene was used for cleaning purposes at a rate of 2±3 l per minute).…”

Personal and Static Sample Measurements of Asbestos Fibres During Two Abatement Projects

“…Such results are concordant with previous research relating ambient and personal samples. The underestimation could lead to inadvertently tolerating hazardous work conditions in such sites (Lange et al 1996;Lange 2003;Cherrie 2004Cherrie , 1999Paustenbach et al 2004).…”

Nanoparticle Release in Indoor Workplaces: Emission Sources, Release Determinants and Release Categories Based on Workplace Measurements

“…This parameter is commonly expressed in terms of application rate (kg or l/h), amount produced or volume of materials processed per time unit (m 3 /h). Other factors reported by different authors [9,51,52] that may affect the release potential in occupational environments are the following:…”