The Effect of Risk Characteristics on the Willingness to Pay for Mortality Risk Reductions from Electric Power Generation

Abstract

The objective of this study is to estimate willingness to pay (WTP) for the reduction of mortality risks caused by fossil fuel (natural gas, coal and oil) versus nuclear electric power generation systems and to examine the influence of risk characteristics involved with electric power generation on WTP. A choice experiment was conducted to achieve these objectives. The attributes for nuclear risks in the experiment included the probability of disasters and the expected losses if a disaster occurs. We find evidence of (i) a baseline effect (where WTP is sensitive to hypothetical versus actual baseline expected mortality); (ii) a ‘labeling effect,’ where, surprisingly, the term ‘nuclear’ has no effect on WTP, but the term ‘fossil-fueled power generation’ results in lower WTP; and (iii) disaster aversion, meaning that people focus on the conditional loss from a nuclear disaster, not the probability. We also find that the WTP for reducing deaths from a nuclear disaster is about 60 times the WTP for routine reducing fossil-fuel generation-related deaths. Copyright Springer 2006choice experiment, coal-fired generation, mortality, nuclear power, risk characteristics, willingness to pay,

Analyzing the Role of Resource Factors in Citizens’ Intention to Pay for and Participate in Disaster Management

“…They confirmed a positive link between risk perception and disaster preparedness. According to Itaoka et al [40], as willingness to pay is sensitive to expected mortality, the higher the risk, the higher the willingness to pay. They demonstrated that the willingness to pay for reducing deaths from a nuclear disaster is about 60 times the willingness to pay for reducing fossil-fuel generation-related deaths.…”

How to value protection from natural hazards – a step-by-step discrete choice approach

“…Advantages and disadvantages of labelling in CE are subject of an on-going discussion in environmental CE literature and beyond de Bekker-Grob et al, 2010;Doherty et al, 2011;Itaoka et al, 2006;Jacobsen et al, 2008). This study aims at determining the impact of labelling on WTP estimates related to natural hazard protection.…”

Can Property Values Capture Changes in Environmental Health Risks? Evidence from a Stated Preference Study in Italy and the United Kingdom

“…7 Finally, SP methods cater to a variety of contexts and causes of death, allowing researchers to test if, for example, accidental mortality risks are valued differently from causes of death usually linked with environmental exposures. SP methods have been used to elicit the willingness to pay for risk reductions in a variety of contexts, including transportation and road safety, (40,41) contaminated site cleanup, (42,43) and risks from power generation, (44) among others. In fact, in a recent meta-analysis, Lindhjem et al (20) identify 76 SP studies, which were conducted in 38 different countries, and cover mortality risks in environmental, health, and transportation contexts.…”