2013
DOI: 10.1002/bin.1362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Response Effort on Compliance in Young Children

Abstract: We evaluated the effect of response effort on compliance with three children who exhibited noncompliance when asked to relinquish a preferred toy. Participants were given access to a preferred toy and then asked to place the toy in a toy bin, which was located either 0.3 m (low effort) or 3 m (high effort) away. We used a reversal design to evaluate the effect of the effort manipulation. Compliance by all three participants was sensitive to the effort manipulation. In addition, compliance by two participants m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, COAs may be advantageous when there is reason to suspect problem behavior is maintained by escape—a commonly identified function for noncompliance and other problem behaviors occurring in the context of academic instruction (McKerchar & Abby, 2012). Because response effort has been shown to impact compliance in young children (e.g., Wilder, Fischetti, Myers, Leon-Enriquez, & Majdalany, 2013), escape alone can be insufficient to reinforce compliance or work completion as a higher effort alternative to problem behavior (Neef, Shade, & Miller, 1994). In the study by Quigley et al (2013), researchers designed an intervention in which the student chose between (a) working to earn access to adult attention and preferred items and (b) a break without access to these consequences.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, COAs may be advantageous when there is reason to suspect problem behavior is maintained by escape—a commonly identified function for noncompliance and other problem behaviors occurring in the context of academic instruction (McKerchar & Abby, 2012). Because response effort has been shown to impact compliance in young children (e.g., Wilder, Fischetti, Myers, Leon-Enriquez, & Majdalany, 2013), escape alone can be insufficient to reinforce compliance or work completion as a higher effort alternative to problem behavior (Neef, Shade, & Miller, 1994). In the study by Quigley et al (2013), researchers designed an intervention in which the student chose between (a) working to earn access to adult attention and preferred items and (b) a break without access to these consequences.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…show that the guided-compliance procedure can increase compliance across a variety of different contexts (e.g., Miles & Wilder, 2009;Wilder, Fischetti, Myers, Leon-Enriquez, & Majdalany, 2013), Wilder et al demonstrated that the effectiveness of the intervention may be compromised if therapists implement the procedures with low levels of treatment integrity. Carroll et al (2013) conducted a series of studies evaluating the effects of treatmentintegrity errors on skill acquisition for children with ASD during DTT.…”
Section: Treatment Integritymentioning
confidence: 99%