2000
DOI: 10.1378/chest.117.2.467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Respiratory Therapist-Initiated Treatment Protocols on Patient Outcomes and Resource Utilization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
65
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
65
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The study revealed that using respiratory-therapist-driven protocols (firm A) was associated with fewer RT treatments (10.7 for firm A vs 12.4 for firm B vs 12.3 for firm C, P ϭ .009), a greater percentage of bronchodilators administered via metered-dose inhaler (89% vs 77% vs 78%, P ϭ .01), fewer RT orders that were discordant with the protocol standard (24% vs 58% in firms B and C, risk 35 these benefits were achieved without any increase in adverse events. In summary, these 2 randomized controlled trials 35,36 (see Table 1) and the earlier observational studies [32][33][34] strongly satisfy both criteria to establish the scientific basis of respiratory care protocols. Specifically, respiratory therapists implementing protocol-based care benefit patients, and the use of such protocols enhances allocation and lowers cost, compared with traditional physiciandirected respiratory care.…”
Section: Are Respiratory Protocols Effective In Providing Non-icu Care?mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The study revealed that using respiratory-therapist-driven protocols (firm A) was associated with fewer RT treatments (10.7 for firm A vs 12.4 for firm B vs 12.3 for firm C, P ϭ .009), a greater percentage of bronchodilators administered via metered-dose inhaler (89% vs 77% vs 78%, P ϭ .01), fewer RT orders that were discordant with the protocol standard (24% vs 58% in firms B and C, risk 35 these benefits were achieved without any increase in adverse events. In summary, these 2 randomized controlled trials 35,36 (see Table 1) and the earlier observational studies [32][33][34] strongly satisfy both criteria to establish the scientific basis of respiratory care protocols. Specifically, respiratory therapists implementing protocol-based care benefit patients, and the use of such protocols enhances allocation and lowers cost, compared with traditional physiciandirected respiratory care.…”
Section: Are Respiratory Protocols Effective In Providing Non-icu Care?mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Although physicians-in-training provided the intervention in this study, experience in other studies suggests that respiratory therapists can also be highly effective in this role. [30][31][32][33][34][35][36] Kallam et al 29 compared the prescribing patterns and associated costs with physician-directed care versus suggested RT-protocol-administered care. Protocols would have lessened the frequency of bronchodilator administration (eg, from 63.6% administered every 4 h to 11.3% administered every 4 h, P Ͻ .001) and the cost per patient ($10.3 Ϯ 9.4/patient vs $19.0 Ϯ 6.9/patient, P Ͻ .001).…”
Section: Are Respiratory Protocols Effective In Providing Non-icu Care?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7 The goal of these protocols is to deliver effective and appropriate care to patients who would benefit from these treatments. 5,6 Moreover, when evidence is present for certain therapies, protocols help to eliminate the variability in delivery of care and may contribute to decreased healthcare cost.…”
Section: See the Original Study On Page 431mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6] These studies have shown an improvement in cost and allocation of non-ICU patients when respiratory-therapy-protocol-based care was used. [1][2][3][4][5][6] Nevertheless, the effects of bronchodilator therapy as a single intervention using a respiratorytherapy protocol are less known.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%