1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf01271567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of reserpine treatment in vivo upon L-dopa and amphetamine evoked dopamine and DOPAC efflux in vitro from the corpus striatum of male rats

Abstract: In the present experiment we tested the effects of L-DOPA and amphetamine upon dopamine and DOPAC efflux in vitro from superfused corpus striatal tissue fragments of male rats who had been pretreated with reserpine. Male rats were treated with reserpine (5 mg/kg) or its vehicle at 24 hours prior to sacrifice and superfusion of the corpus striatum. Two different modes of L-DOPA (5 microM) and amphetamine (10 microM) stimulation, a brief 10-minute and a continuous 60-minute infusion, were tested for their abilit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
5
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These results contrast with studies in reserpinized rats, where NSD-1015 decreased striatal decarboxylation of L-DOPA to dopamine, while extending the behavioural effect (Fisher et al 2000). However, their methodology is different from the present study, as reserpine affects only vesicular storage of dopamine (Dluzen & Liu, 1994). Several authors also report a discrepancy between the quantities of DA recovered by brain dialysis and the intensity of the motor response produced by L-DOPA (Spencer & Wooten, 1984;Zetterstrom et al, 1986;Nakazoto & Akiyama, 1989).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results contrast with studies in reserpinized rats, where NSD-1015 decreased striatal decarboxylation of L-DOPA to dopamine, while extending the behavioural effect (Fisher et al 2000). However, their methodology is different from the present study, as reserpine affects only vesicular storage of dopamine (Dluzen & Liu, 1994). Several authors also report a discrepancy between the quantities of DA recovered by brain dialysis and the intensity of the motor response produced by L-DOPA (Spencer & Wooten, 1984;Zetterstrom et al, 1986;Nakazoto & Akiyama, 1989).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
“…2000). However, their methodology is different from the present study, as reserpine affects only vesicular storage of dopamine (Dluzen & Liu, 1994). Several authors also report a discrepancy between the quantities of DA recovered by brain dialysis and the intensity of the motor response produced by l ‐DOPA (Spencer & Wooten, 1984; Zetterstrom et al ., 1986; Nakazoto & Akiyama, 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a lack of effect of the mGlu2/3-receptor agonists on these levels indicates that dynamics of dopamine reuptake or vesicular storage, two processes that are disrupted by amphetamine (Sulzer et al 1995), are not targeted by these agonists. Amphetamine may also influence dopamine synthesis (Patrick et al 1981); however, we found that increasing extracellular levels of dopamine by L-dopa, which primarily is due to increasing pools of newly synthesized dopamine (Dluzen and Liu 1994), was not affected by mGlu2/3 receptor activation suggesting that these receptors do not influence packaging and release of newly synthesized dopamine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Thus, low doses of amphetamine may release dopamine preferentially from the newly synthesized cytosolic dopamine pool; whereas, higher doses release dopamine from new and older pools of dopamine. Here we observed that mGlu2/3 receptor activation significantly reduces amphetamine-induced dopamine release, but has no effect on dopamine release evoked by the dopamine precursor L-dopa, which is insensitive to reserpine treatment and thus is derived from a newly synthesized pool (Dluzen and Liu 1994). This result is consistent with a recent paper showing that activation of mGlu 2/3 receptors has no effect on the rate of dopamine synthesis in reserpine-treated rats (Fell et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Finally, at high doses, amphetamine redistributes DA from the vesicular to the cytoplasmic pool (Sulzer et aI., 1993; Sulzer et aI., 1995). Thus, reserpine pretreat ment affects amphetamine-induced DA release, at least after high doses of amphetamine (Dluzen and Liu, 1994; Cadoni et aI., 1995; Florin et aI., 1995; Pift et aI., 1995). (1988) showed that pretreatment with the DAT blocker GBR 12909 blocked the effect of amphetamine on [ I I C Jraclo pride BP, as measured during radiotracer constant infu sion paradigm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%