1999
DOI: 10.1097/00008877-199911000-00013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of repeated nicotine administration on the performance of drug-naive rats in a five-choice serial reaction time task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
23
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
23
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to a previous report (Blondel et al 1999), tolerance did not develop to the attention-enhancing effects of nicotine. Not only did these effects remain unaffected in rats that were chronically injected with a large dose of nicotine, but they also did not significantly change with weeks of nicotine-exposure.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to a previous report (Blondel et al 1999), tolerance did not develop to the attention-enhancing effects of nicotine. Not only did these effects remain unaffected in rats that were chronically injected with a large dose of nicotine, but they also did not significantly change with weeks of nicotine-exposure.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In this paradigm, consistent attentional improvements with systemic nicotine have been reported in unlesioned rats (Mirza and Stolerman 1998;Hahn et al 2002). These improvements were obtained repeatedly in the same subjects, in contrast to earlier findings by Blondel et al (1999) where increases in response accuracy disappeared after the first administration of nicotine. Results from another study (Grottick and Higgins 2000) using the 5-CSRTT indicated that the effect was even greater after nicotine pre-exposure (daily injections of 0.2 mg/kg for 20 days or longer).…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…In contrast to the present data, Blondel et al (1999) reported sensitisation to the effects of chronic nicotine on inhibitory control. This discrepancy may be the result of differences in the schedules of nicotine administration, with sensitisation more likely to manifest following intermittent dosing schedules (Blondel et al 1999;see also Di Franza and Wellman 2007) and tolerance more commonly observed when the drug is administered repeatedly in close succession (present study; see also Benwell et al 1995).…”
Section: Effects Of Chronic Nicotinecontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Blondel et al 1999;Semenova et al 2007) but also supports the increase in disinhibition and impulsive choice following chronic treatment/self-administration with other psychostimulants such as cocaine and methamphetamine (e.g. Jentsch et al 2002;Richards et al 1999;Winstanley et al 2009).…”
Section: Effects Of Chronic Nicotinementioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation