“…These methods were reviewed by Kool et al [ 14 ] and classified into two categories: models and measurements. The commonly used models were the Shuttleworth–Wallace model [ 19 ] and its improved structures [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ], the clumped model [ 26 , 27 ], the FAO-56 dual crop coefficient model [ 28 , 29 , 30 ] and other improved dual-source models [ 31 , 32 , 33 ], while measurements were mainly eddy covariance techniques [ 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ] and Bowen ratio systems [ 39 , 40 , 41 ] (acquiring ET), stable isotopes [ 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 ] (acquiring E s or T ), sap flow meters [ 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 ] (acquiring T ), microlysimeters [ 50 , 51 , 52 ] (acquiring E s ) and water collection tanks [ 53 , 54 ] (acquiring E i ). Among these methods, the modeling approach has the advantage of its applicability over a wide range of time scales and can be applied to the spatial scale of an entire ecosystem [ 55 , 56 ], but these models always require complex parameterizations and still require validation.…”