2018
DOI: 10.1177/0093650218789581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Relational Satisfaction and Media Synchronicity on Attributions in Computer-Mediated Conflict

Abstract: An experiment investigated the effect of relational satisfaction and media synchronicity on dating and married couples’ attributions for their partners’ positive and negative conflict behaviors. Couples completed measures of relational satisfaction, and then engaged in an online conflict discussion using synchronous or asynchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC). After the discussion, posttest questionnaires assessed their attributions for their partners’ conflict behavior. Individuals with greater rela… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach parallels the essential hypothesis of “electronic word of mouth” (eWOM) research: Individuals forward mass‐communicated messages to others appended with comments they tailor to the recipients' personalities, which may be more persuasive than if the original message appeared without comments (see for review Flanagin, ). Affective dimensions of relationships also matter: Relational partners in dissatisfying relationships interpret and attribute electronic messages differently than do harmonious relationship partners (e.g., Kashian, ). An online comment from one relationship partner may affect a receiver positively, whereas the same messages from a different relational source may garner reactance; not all relationship partners have the same influence.…”
Section: Metaconstructsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach parallels the essential hypothesis of “electronic word of mouth” (eWOM) research: Individuals forward mass‐communicated messages to others appended with comments they tailor to the recipients' personalities, which may be more persuasive than if the original message appeared without comments (see for review Flanagin, ). Affective dimensions of relationships also matter: Relational partners in dissatisfying relationships interpret and attribute electronic messages differently than do harmonious relationship partners (e.g., Kashian, ). An online comment from one relationship partner may affect a receiver positively, whereas the same messages from a different relational source may garner reactance; not all relationship partners have the same influence.…”
Section: Metaconstructsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MST has been used to study virtual world collaboration systems and email (Hassell and Limayem, 2010), text and audio calls (Tang et al ., 2013), MST training and group effectiveness (Lam, 2016), email and voice mail/phone (Anders et al ., 2020), government social media services (Park et al ., 2016), Wikis (He and Yang, 2016), media choice (face-to-face and email) in the negotiation (Geiger and Laubert, 2018), Twitter (Son et al ., 2019), mobile messenger applications (Park and Lee, 2019), asynchronous (telephone) and synchronous channels during natural disasters (Diwanji et al ., 2020), social mindtools (Huang, 2020), and patient training and education (Kashian and Walther, 2020). MST has not been investigated in the context of VC apps.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, individuals who use primarily FtF communication in couple conflict report a negative relationship between flooding and effective conflict communication, but this relationship is not significant for individuals who use primarily mediated communication, suggesting mediated communication might buffer the negative effect of flooding on conflict communication (Kashian, 2019). Experimental research shows that satisfied individuals make relationally enhancing attributions for their partners’ conflict behavior when they use asynchronous communication, but not synchronous communication (Kashian and Walther, 2020).…”
Section: The Impact Of Channel On Negative Spillover and Crossovermentioning
confidence: 99%