1984
DOI: 10.1002/sce.3730680210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of reasoning on student performance on different sections of a posttest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1984
1984
1987
1987

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
(9 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Staver (1978;Staver & Gabel, 1979) found a wide range of sophistication in high school age subjects' responses to five Piagetian formal reasoning tasks during the validation of the Piagetian Logical Operations Test, PLOT. This finding has been replicated in subsequent research using PLOT to assess the reasoning of high school students (Staver & Halsted, 1982). Howe and Durr (1982) reported similar results during a study on the cognitive demands of instructional units in high school chemistry.…”
supporting
confidence: 57%
“…Staver (1978;Staver & Gabel, 1979) found a wide range of sophistication in high school age subjects' responses to five Piagetian formal reasoning tasks during the validation of the Piagetian Logical Operations Test, PLOT. This finding has been replicated in subsequent research using PLOT to assess the reasoning of high school students (Staver & Halsted, 1982). Howe and Durr (1982) reported similar results during a study on the cognitive demands of instructional units in high school chemistry.…”
supporting
confidence: 57%