1976
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(76)85049-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of re-entrainment on particle deposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of particle removal is controlled by the local wall shear stress [24]. The wall shear stress in a packing is calculated by a 3D-interpolation of the velocity vectors of the complex fluid flow from the CFD simulations onto different points on a radial line to deliver tangential velocities.…”
Section: Shear Stress Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of particle removal is controlled by the local wall shear stress [24]. The wall shear stress in a packing is calculated by a 3D-interpolation of the velocity vectors of the complex fluid flow from the CFD simulations onto different points on a radial line to deliver tangential velocities.…”
Section: Shear Stress Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The removal process can occur via hydrodynamic forces causing erosion of the deposit, via thermal shock causing spalling of the deposit, and/or via chemical dissolution of the deposit. Moreover, it can be enhanced by randomly distributed turbulent bursts similar to miniature tornadoes, which eject fluid out of the region adjacent to the wall into the main fluid stream (Cleaver and Yates, 1973, 1976 …”
Section: Removal and Autoretardationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bursting process repeats itself and dominates the particle transport, while the particle presence may affect the mechanism by which the turbulent energy is transported from the wall region to the bulk flow. Cleaver and Yates [14] attempted to model deposition based on the available knowledge of the reported sub-layer structure and suggested that particles are carried into the laminar sub-layer by the effect of turbulent burst. Then, because of their inertia, they deviate from the fluid path and reach the surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%