The effect of rapid privatisation on mortality in mono-industrial towns in post-Soviet Russia: a retrospective cohort study

Abstract

SummaryBackgroundPopulation-level data suggest that economic disruptions in the early 1990s increased working-age male mortality in post-Soviet countries. This study uses individual-level data, using an indirect estimation method, to test the hypothesis that fast privatisation increased mortality in Russia.MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, we surveyed surviving relatives of individuals who lived through the post-communist transition to retrieve demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of their parents, siblings, and male partners. The survey was done within the framework of the European Research Council (ERC) project PrivMort (The Impact of Privatization on the Mortality Crisis in Eastern Europe). We surveyed relatives in 20 mono-industrial towns in the European part of Russia (ie, the landmass to the west of the Urals). We compared ten fast-privatised and ten slow-privatised towns selected using propensity score matching. In the selected towns, population surveys were done in which respondents provided information about vital status, sociodemographic and socioeconomic characteristics and health-related behaviours of their parents, two eldest siblings (if eligible), and first husbands or long-term partners. We calculated indirect age-standardised mortality rates in fast and slow privatised towns and then, in multivariate analyses, calculated Poisson proportional incidence rate ratios to estimate the effect of rapid privatisation on all-cause mortality risk.FindingsBetween November, 2014, and March, 2015, 21 494 households were identified in 20 towns. Overall, 13 932 valid interviews were done (with information collected for 38 339 relatives [21 634 men and 16 705 women]). Fast privatisation was strongly associated with higher working-age male mortality rates both between 1992 and 1998 (age-standardised mortality ratio in men aged 20–69 years in fast vs slow privatised towns: 1·13, SMR 0·83, 95% CI 0·77–0·88 vs 0·73, 0·69–0·77, respectively) and from 1999 to 2006 (1·15, 0·91, 0·86–0·97 vs 0·79, 0·75–0·84). After adjusting for age, marital status, material deprivation history, smoking, drinking and socioeconomic status, working-age men in fast-privatised towns experienced 13% higher mortality than in slow-privatised towns (95% CI 1–26).InterpretationThe rapid pace of privatisation was a significant factor in the marked increase in working-age male mortality in post-Soviet Russia. By providing compelling evidence in support of the health benefits of a slower pace of privatisation, this study can assist policy makers in making informed decisions about the speed and scope of government interventions.FundingThe European Research Council.

Cross‐country evidence on the social determinants of the post‐socialist mortality crisis in Europe: a review and performance‐based hierarchy of variables

“…However, using multilevel data on settlements and individuals we have confirmed that privatisation was associated with higher mortality among men in Russia (Azarova et al . ), and among women in Hungary (Scheiring et al ., ).…”

The wounds of post-socialism: a systematic review of the social determinants of mortality in Hungary

“…However, some researchers questioned the robustness of the association between shock therapy and mortality arguing that the result was prone to ecological fallacy (Gentile 2012;Earle and Gehlbach 2010). A recently published article has shown that the association between mass privatisation and mortality was real, confirming the detrimental health effect of rapid privatisation using multilevel individual, company and settlement data (Azarova et al 2017).…”

“…There is accumulating evidence of the ways in which consequences of sudden economic transformations such as increasing precariousness of employment (Barlow et al 2015), work (Waters 2014) and housing (Clair et al 2016) impact adversely on health. Neoliberal policies have been empirically shown to increase health problems and mortality (Coburn 2000;De Vogli 2011), including the detrimental health effect of rapid privatisation (Azarova et al 2017), structural adjustment (Kentikelenis 2017), or austerity (Karanikolos et al 2013).…”

“…There is a growing literature addressing the issue of the post-socialist mortality crisis both in Hungary and beyond (Brainerd 1998;Rosefielde 2001;Bobak and Marmot 1996;Cornia and Paniccià 2000;Shkolnikov and Cornia 2000;Cockerham, Snead, and DeWaal 2002;Azarova et al 2017;McKee 2001;McKee and Shkolnikov 2001;Stuckler, King, and McKee 2009;Haynes 2013). Yet as of today there is no systematic review of the scholarly work on the social determinants of mortality in Hungary.…”

The Road to Psychopathology: Neoliberalism and the Human Mind

“…Yet after some four decades’ experience with neoliberal policies, even IMF economists have recognized that neoliberalism's “benefits in terms of increased growth seem fairly difficult to establish,” while its “costs in terms of increased inequality are prominent” (Ostry, Loungani, & Furceri , p. 39). The natural experiment provided by the former Soviet Union indicates that neoliberal economic policies contribute to greater anomie and crime (Passas, ), along with an increase in premature deaths (Azarova et al., ). Global rates of economic growth have been lower in the neoliberal era, compared to those of the decades of “collectivist” planning and restrictions on finance and trade (Chang, ; Harvey ).…”