1987
DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90500-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of protein context on nuclear location signal function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
116
1
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 206 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
6
116
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Epitope tags have proven reliable for the analysis of nuclear targeting since a given NLS can function at a variety of positions in a protein (Roberts et al, 1987), however insertion of tags could potentially disrupt normal protein targeting. To circumvent this potential problem we characterized BRCA1 subcellular localization with both N-terminal and C-terminal tags as well as non-tagged proteins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epitope tags have proven reliable for the analysis of nuclear targeting since a given NLS can function at a variety of positions in a protein (Roberts et al, 1987), however insertion of tags could potentially disrupt normal protein targeting. To circumvent this potential problem we characterized BRCA1 subcellular localization with both N-terminal and C-terminal tags as well as non-tagged proteins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two identical NLSs KRRR of S6 represent a relatively strong signal because when this tetrapeptide is fused to 13-galactosidase it directs the hybrid protein exclusively into the nucleus (Figure 3). Efficiency of nuclear import can be influenced by the protein context of the NLS (Roberts et al, 1987;Nelson and Silver, 1989), by distant sequences (Gao and Knipe, 1992) …”
Section: Differential Import Efficiencies Of the Nlss Of S6mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reiterated NLSs, of similar but not identical sequence, are present in some proteins, as in the polyoma virus T antigen (Richardson et al, 1986) and the glucocorticoid receptor (Picard & Yamamoto, 1987). In the case of redundant or bipartite signals, mutations at one of them may impair but do not abolish the transport process, suggesting a modular structure of the NLS (Robbins et al, 1991), Although the NLS is sufficient for a protein to be transported into the cell nucleus, it may not be independent of the sequence context in which it is located because the NLS needs to be accessible for interaction with the transport machinery (Roberts et al, 1987), and this accessibility can be modulated by intramolecular (Henkel et al, 1992) or intermolecular masking (for review, see Schmitz et al, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%