2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04000-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of prolonged laser activation on irrigation fluid temperature: an in vitro experimental study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistently, Teng, J et al [23] found that a ow of 15 mL/min can prevent temperature rise above 43ºC in human fURS with laser settings up to 20W. In an vitro model, we also found that a ow of 20 mL/min can prevent dangerous temperature rise with laser settings up to 60W [24]. Furthermore, our group has also shown that high-power lithotripsy with 60W can be safely performed in a porcine model without reaching dangerous temperatures using a manual pumping irrigation system and a UAS [10].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Consistently, Teng, J et al [23] found that a ow of 15 mL/min can prevent temperature rise above 43ºC in human fURS with laser settings up to 20W. In an vitro model, we also found that a ow of 20 mL/min can prevent dangerous temperature rise with laser settings up to 60W [24]. Furthermore, our group has also shown that high-power lithotripsy with 60W can be safely performed in a porcine model without reaching dangerous temperatures using a manual pumping irrigation system and a UAS [10].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Their work sought to adapt their previous findings to an in vivo porcine model and found that temperatures capable of tissue damage were easily achieved but can be negated by increasing irrigation flow rate 15 . Other labs have also evaluated irrigation rates and have determined that increased irrigation rates can mitigate temperature increases during active lasing, as too can the use of a UAS [16][17][18] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same scenario, but with an irrigation of 8 mL/s, the peak temperature was 37.4°C [ 18 ]. Another in vitro assessment showed that fluid outflow rates of 20 and 30 mL/min were sufficient to maintain the temperature below the threshold (43°C) when using 40 W and 60 W in an intermittent activation fashion [ 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%