1984
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0418.1984.tb02680.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of previous damage on the quality of Scots pine foliage as food for Diprionid sawflies

Abstract: The effect of age and previous damage of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) foliage on the larval growth and survival of four Diprionid species was studied in the laboratory and field. One and two‐year‐old needles supported the fastest larval growth and highest pupal weights of Neodiprion sertifer. On current‐year foliage the larval growth was strongly retarded. Damage‐induced reactions in the mature foliage of Scots pine were studied by rearing larvae on needles originating from trees which were partly or totally … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and Microdiprion pallipes Fall. All defoliate droughtstressed trees (Niemela et al 1984;Lyytikainen-Saarenmaa and Tomppo 2002).…”
Section: Diprionidaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…and Microdiprion pallipes Fall. All defoliate droughtstressed trees (Niemela et al 1984;Lyytikainen-Saarenmaa and Tomppo 2002).…”
Section: Diprionidaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oporinia autumnata-Betula pubescens; Lymantria dispar-Quercus robur (Wagner and Raffa, 1993)]. Niemela et al (1984) studied the short-term effects of defoliation on Neodiprion sertifer, Gilpinia virens Klug, Microdiprion pallipes Fall and Diprion pini, as well as the longterm effects on N. sertifer. They observed an increase in the mortality of M. pallipes and an increase in the rate of development of N. sertifer and G. virens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, Scots pine as an evergreen conifer is considered to have low induced chemical responses to defoliation (e.g. Niemelä et al 1984, Tuomi et al 1988, Lyytikäinen 1993b. Plant defence and growth hypotheses, however, are developing continuously (Honkanen 1995, Hamilton et al 2001, Koricheva 2002, Stamp 2003.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%