1984
DOI: 10.1029/jb089ib11p09425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of pressure on porosity and the transport properties of rock

Abstract: We reanalyze the flow model proposed by Wyllie and Rose (1950) in which the complicated flow network through the pore phase of rock is replaced by a single representative conduit. Although the model is a very simple representation of the complicated pore phase in rock, we find that it provides an adequate simulation of how the transport properties vary with external pressure. Expressions derived for fluid permeability k and formation factor F are combined to give an expression for the mean hydraulic radius of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
279
2
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 470 publications
(296 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
14
279
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The streaming current International Journal of Geophysics coefficient C c was approximately proportional to the square root of the permeability. This dependence can be explained by assuming that m 2 is proportional to 1/F = η/T 2 in (5) and (6) for the capillary model [17,27,32]. This assumption is supported by the experimental results that log k is linearly related to log F with slope of ∼ −2 for granite reported by Walsh and Brace [32].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The streaming current International Journal of Geophysics coefficient C c was approximately proportional to the square root of the permeability. This dependence can be explained by assuming that m 2 is proportional to 1/F = η/T 2 in (5) and (6) for the capillary model [17,27,32]. This assumption is supported by the experimental results that log k is linearly related to log F with slope of ∼ −2 for granite reported by Walsh and Brace [32].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…In such circumstances the Carnmenellis granite must be viewed as comprising very resistive 'intact' rock and many voids such as joints, cracks and pores which are saturated with interstitial fluids. Both the flow of fluid (governed by the permeability of the rock) and the flow of electric current (governed by the resistivity of the rock) are then principally controlled by the nature of the void and fluid content (Walsh & Brace 1984). The applicability of the 'Brace' model appears to be confirmed by an examination of the resistivity laterologs from the geothermal wells at Rosemanowes quarry (supplied by the Camborne School of Mines).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Electrical resistivity or diffusion measurements are used to estimate Γ by some authors e.g., Berryman and Blair (1987), Cornell and Katz (1953), Dullien (1975), Pape et al (2006), Walsh and Brace, (1984).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%