2014
DOI: 10.1089/aid.2014.5070.abstract
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Presentation of Pharmacokinetic (PK) Drug Results on Self-reported Study Product Adherence among VOICE Participants in Zimbabwe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance of peers in adoption of the contraceptive NuvaRing (N.V. Organon, Oss, The Netherlands) was a key finding in a US study among adolescent girls [33]. By contrast, at the start of ASPIRE, and in other PrEP trials at the same African research sites, negative peer influence – for example rumors and widespread reports of nonadherence in waiting rooms – negatively affected adherence [10,34]. Researchers' efforts to provide individual and peer support may be critical investments of time and energy that ultimately serve multiple overlapping objectives: addressing physical and emotional barriers to product use, educating participants about the research process and their role in a global HIV prevention effort, fostering respect and trust among researchers and participants and ultimately supporting adherence and enhancing product effectiveness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of peers in adoption of the contraceptive NuvaRing (N.V. Organon, Oss, The Netherlands) was a key finding in a US study among adolescent girls [33]. By contrast, at the start of ASPIRE, and in other PrEP trials at the same African research sites, negative peer influence – for example rumors and widespread reports of nonadherence in waiting rooms – negatively affected adherence [10,34]. Researchers' efforts to provide individual and peer support may be critical investments of time and energy that ultimately serve multiple overlapping objectives: addressing physical and emotional barriers to product use, educating participants about the research process and their role in a global HIV prevention effort, fostering respect and trust among researchers and participants and ultimately supporting adherence and enhancing product effectiveness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In VOICE-C, a qualitative study conducted concurrently with VOICE, women were unwilling to personally acknowledge nonadherence [21]. In VOICE-D, only after provision of PK results did women acknowledge nonuse as well as other socially undesirable behaviors [32]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When combined with in-depth interviews, pharmacokinetic measures are powerful tools to understand the determinants of product use in HIV prevention trials, in particular the aspects of participants' lives and the characteristics of the product and dosing regimen that either facilitate or undermine product use. Indeed, in the VOICE D qualitative sub-study of 127 active arm participants conducted after the trial was completed using interviewers who were not involved in the main trial, only in the second stage (November 2013-April 2014) when participants were retrospectively provided with their plasma drug levels from the trial did they finally disclose nonuse and offer explanations for this [16, 17]. In stage 1 of VOICE D (December 2012 – March 2013, N=88, 44 of whom also participated in stage 2), participants again did not acknowledge non-use; rather, they discussed other women not using [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, in the VOICE D qualitative sub-study of 127 active arm participants conducted after the trial was completed using interviewers who were not involved in the main trial, only in the second stage (November 2013-April 2014) when participants were retrospectively provided with their plasma drug levels from the trial did they finally disclose nonuse and offer explanations for this [16, 17]. In stage 1 of VOICE D (December 2012 – March 2013, N=88, 44 of whom also participated in stage 2), participants again did not acknowledge non-use; rather, they discussed other women not using [17]. So on their own, in-depth interviews, thought to encourage greater rapport between participants and study staff than conventional structured interviews, also failed to encourage disclosure of nonuse.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%