1984
DOI: 10.1002/j.1939-4640.1984.tb00781.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Prepubertal Spermatic Cord Torsion on Subsequent Fertility in Rats

Abstract: This study was undertaken to determine the effects of various durations of testicular torsion in prepubertal rats on their subsequent fertility, and to determine whether these effects could be altered by removal of the torsioned testis. Sixty rats (35 days old) were subjected to 720 degrees unilateral spermatic cord torsion for 0, 1, 3, 5, 9, or 12 hours. The torsioned testis was then either detorsioned or removed. At 65 days of age each male was housed with two females for three weeks. Rats undergoing detorsi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same studies have shown that contralateral testicular dysfunction occurs when the affected testicle is left in situ. Further animal studies have supported the concept that the presence of a torsed testis in situ for prolonged periods has a deleterious effect on the contralateral testis and that early removal of the torsed organ has a protective effect on the opposite testis [19]. Overall, the data are very supportive of an immunologically mediated contralateral effect in postpubertal animals [110].…”
Section: Testicular Torsionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The same studies have shown that contralateral testicular dysfunction occurs when the affected testicle is left in situ. Further animal studies have supported the concept that the presence of a torsed testis in situ for prolonged periods has a deleterious effect on the contralateral testis and that early removal of the torsed organ has a protective effect on the opposite testis [19]. Overall, the data are very supportive of an immunologically mediated contralateral effect in postpubertal animals [110].…”
Section: Testicular Torsionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Several studies have claimed that the contralateral testis is not affected by unilateral torsion (Turner, 1985;Becker and Turner, 1995;Anderson and Williamson, 1990;Turner and Brown, 1993;Akg€ ur et al, 1993Akg€ ur et al, , 1995 while others favored the opposite view (Nagler and deVere White, 1982;Cerasaro et al, 1984;Cosentino et al, 1984;Thomas et al, 1984;Sade et al, 1988;Tanyel et al, 1989;Saba et al, 1997;Kosar et al, 1997;€ Ozkan et al, 2004). These discrepancies appear to stem, in some cases, from the different animal models used, which fail to produce a reliable testicular ischemia-reperfusion situation (Costabile et al, 1994).…”
Section: Does Unilateral Torsion Affects Contralateral Testis?mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Some studies in laboratory animals reported no effect of torsion/detorsion (Turner, 1985;Becker and Turner, 1995;Nagler et al, 1984) while others reported several biochemical (Akg€ ur et al, 1993(Akg€ ur et al, , 1994 and histological changes (Nagler and deVere White, 1982;Cerasaro et al, 1984;Cosentino et al, 1984) that were indicative of tissue damage. These conflicting reports have led to two distinct recommendations regarding surgical procedures: detortion and preservation of the ipsilateral testis (Anderson and Williamson, 1990;Anderson et al, 1992), or its orchiectomy to preserve contralateral function and fertility (Cosentino et al, 1984;Sarica et al, 1997). A study carried out in humans indicates that an early (mean torsion time of less than 13 h) surgical intervention with detorsion preserves fertility but prolonged torsion periods (mean torsion time of 70 h) followed by orchieoctomy jeopardize fertility (Anderson et al, 1992).…”
Section: Unilateral Testicular Torsion and Fertilitymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The number of pregnancies occurring in each test group was also noted. The size and number of embryos in those females that did become pregnant were assessed and the product of these two factors was used as an index of fecundity (11)(12)(13).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%