2013
DOI: 10.1089/bsp.2013.0008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Preprocessing by Sequence-Independent, Single-Primer Amplification (SISPA) on Metagenomic Detection of Viruses

Abstract: Compared to routine diagnostics, screening for pathogens in outbreak situations, with or without intentional release, poses demands on the detection technology to not only indicate the presence of already known causative agents but also novel and unexpected pathogens. The metagenomic approach to detecting viral pathogens, using unbiased high-throughput sequencing (HTS), is a well-established methodology with a broad detection range and wide applicability on different sample matrices. To prepare a sample for HT… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MDA preferentially amplifies circular ssDNA viruses leading to an overrepresentation of this group in the final datasets [4951]. In contrast, RP-SISPA is biased towards the most abundant viruses, as well as those with the largest genomes, and will therefore underrepresent small or less abundant ssDNA viruses [25, 52]. Other technical factors in the extraction and analysis protocols will have introduced additional biases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MDA preferentially amplifies circular ssDNA viruses leading to an overrepresentation of this group in the final datasets [4951]. In contrast, RP-SISPA is biased towards the most abundant viruses, as well as those with the largest genomes, and will therefore underrepresent small or less abundant ssDNA viruses [25, 52]. Other technical factors in the extraction and analysis protocols will have introduced additional biases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recommend the use of the RP-SISPA methods presented here for amplifying viral DNA and RNA isolated from coral tissue using mechanical disruption. RP-SISPA has been used previously to detect and identify viruses through a metagenomic approach (Culley et al, 2010; Karlsson et al, 2013), and has an advantage over MDA in that branching does not occur during amplification, the formation of chimeras is reduced and ssDNA is not preferentially amplified (Polson et al, 2011). However, RP-SISPA is not without its own issues and has been reported to show a template-dependent amplification bias, resulting in uneven sequencing depth within and among genomes (Victoria et al, 2009, 2010; Rosseel et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, RP-SISPA is not without its own issues and has been reported to show a template-dependent amplification bias, resulting in uneven sequencing depth within and among genomes (Victoria et al, 2009, 2010; Rosseel et al, 2013). RP-SISPA can have a bias for amplifying the dominant sequences in metagenomic samples (Karlsson et al, 2013), likely the reason that most of the sequences in the RP-SISPA metagenomes contain sequences from the dsDNA viruses, which have larger genomes relative to other viral types. In addition, PCR amplification is known to produce amplification artifacts, such as increased heteroduplex formation in samples with increased diversity (Qiu et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Desert soils frequently produce suboptimal (Յ10 ng/l) viral DNA yields (66), forcing the inclusion of a random PCR amplification step for NGS library construction. The use of whole-genome amplification (WGA) by multiple-displacement amplification (MDA) or random-priming, sequence-independent, single-primer amplification (RP-SISPA) (67) almost certainly results in biased amplification of certain virus groups (68)(69)(70)(71) and prevents the accurate determination of viral abundances and diversity. While viral amplification is widely accepted as a necessity in metaviromic studies (72), we argue that amplification of virus metagenomic DNA should be avoided where possible.…”
Section: Technical Recommendations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%