2018
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-13481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of prepartum feeding and lying space on metabolic health and immune function

Abstract: The determinants of metabolic and reproductive health disorders in the peripartum period and the degree to which feeding and lying space and management can influence health are only partially understood. The objective of this randomized controlled study was to determine whether providing noncompetitive feeding and lying access in the close-up dry period improves health and immune function. Forty-eight Holstein cows of all parities were randomly assigned to a treatment group of 6 to 10 cows in 1 pen with either… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These authors hypothesise that such cows may spend more time in aggressive interactions but fail to use their apparent advantage to consume more feed or achieve greater health (at least with respect to uterine disease). We concluded from our study (Miltenburg et al, 2018a) and the published data on the effects of crowding on metabolic health and innate immune function that the evidence does not refute the potential importance of space allowances under field conditions, but feeding and lying space alone are not the critical determinants of immune function in transition dairy cows. The minimal and optimal amounts of feeding and lying space likely depend on other variables, including whether primiparous and multiparous animals are commingled in the prepartum period (Chebel et al, 2016).…”
Section: Management and Social Stress Effectscontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…These authors hypothesise that such cows may spend more time in aggressive interactions but fail to use their apparent advantage to consume more feed or achieve greater health (at least with respect to uterine disease). We concluded from our study (Miltenburg et al, 2018a) and the published data on the effects of crowding on metabolic health and innate immune function that the evidence does not refute the potential importance of space allowances under field conditions, but feeding and lying space alone are not the critical determinants of immune function in transition dairy cows. The minimal and optimal amounts of feeding and lying space likely depend on other variables, including whether primiparous and multiparous animals are commingled in the prepartum period (Chebel et al, 2016).…”
Section: Management and Social Stress Effectscontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…Neutrophil isolation from whole blood with acid citrate dextrose was done within 3 h of collection. The procedure for neutrophil isolation and the oxidative burst and phagocytosis assays was as reported in Miltenburg et al (2018). For the oxidative burst assay, 200 μL of reconstituted neutrophils was incubated with fluorescent dye, and oxidative burst was stimulated with phorbol myristate acetate (PMA).…”
Section: Short Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A gate was placed around the neutrophil population on forward versus side scatter cytograms using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR). Per Miltenburg et al (2018), the shift in the percentage of cells that underwent oxidative burst or phagocytosis was evaluated relative to each cow's negative control. A gate was placed around ≥97% of negative controls fluorescence (no PMA for the oxidative burst analysis and no fluorescent beads for the phagocytosis analysis), and the difference between the negative control and the positive observation for the percentage of cells outside the negative control gate was used to express success of oxidative burst or phagocytosis.…”
Section: Short Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study only included 2 farms, and therefore, was not designed to examine the effect of herd management practices on SCH classification. Miltenburg et al (2018) has found a tendency for prepartum cows being housed at 80% pen density to have greater Ca concentrations in the postpartum as compared with cows housed at 120% stocking density. Silva et al (2013) failed to observe any differences in postpartum energy metabolites when prepartum Jersey cows were housed as a closed group (i.e., no animal additions) versus weekly pen-moves (i.e., with addition of new animals) in the close-up pen; that study did not investigate the effect of pen-moves on postpartum Ca concentrations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%