2021
DOI: 10.1111/jce.14906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of posterior wall isolation for persistent atrial fibrillation on recurrent arrhythmia

Abstract: Introduction It is important to consider recurrent arrhythmia after catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) for planning an ablation strategy. However, the studies are limited to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) plus posterior wall isolation (PWI), which were reported to improve procedural outcomes. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of PWI on recurrent arrhythmia. Methods This is an observational study on patients with persistent AF comparing PVI plus PWI and PVI only strate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, it must be recognized that when treating advanced forms of AF, study endpoints should be considered accordingly. A recent observational study of 181 patients with PsAF (90 underwent PVI plus PWI) noted significantly less recurrent PsAF among those with PWI (5.6% vs. 20.9%, p = .002), but no difference in rate of pAF (16.7% vs. 20.9%, p = .47) or atrial tachycardia (8.9% vs. 5.5%, p = .38) 60 . It is important to consider than in patients with PsAF, while an occasional paroxysm of AF may be deemed a “failure” in the context of a clinical trial, the procedure may still result in significant clinical benefit.…”
Section: Ongoing Randomized Trialsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Finally, it must be recognized that when treating advanced forms of AF, study endpoints should be considered accordingly. A recent observational study of 181 patients with PsAF (90 underwent PVI plus PWI) noted significantly less recurrent PsAF among those with PWI (5.6% vs. 20.9%, p = .002), but no difference in rate of pAF (16.7% vs. 20.9%, p = .47) or atrial tachycardia (8.9% vs. 5.5%, p = .38) 60 . It is important to consider than in patients with PsAF, while an occasional paroxysm of AF may be deemed a “failure” in the context of a clinical trial, the procedure may still result in significant clinical benefit.…”
Section: Ongoing Randomized Trialsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This may, in part, be due to the lack of a standardised approach to posterior wall isolation, which is evidenced by the various lesion sets used in published studies. These approaches to posterior wall isolation include a single ring around the PVs and posterior left atrium [ 39 ], linear lesions (left atrial roof and posterior-inferior) to create the so-called posterior ‘box’ lesion [ 37 , 38 , 40 , 41 ], or extensive point-by-point radiofrequency [ 42 ] or segmental cryoballoon ablation [ 43 , 44 ] to debulk the posterior wall. Adjunctive lesions also vary among these studies.…”
Section: The Posterior Wall Of the Left Atrium In Non-paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nearly 70% of patients in their study demonstrated reconnection of the roof line or recurrence of electrical activity within the PW that led to AF and AFL. Sayuri et al showed a reconnection of PW in 65% of patients after the second procedure [ 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%